H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Yannick Hanfmann vs Richard Gasquet
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Yannick Hanfmann vs Richard Gasquet.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 34
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
France
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Hanfmann | #51 | #45 | 974 | 1,865 | 97 | 107 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Richard Gasquet | #448 | #7 | 3,365 | 2,165 | 596 | 406 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yannick Hanfmann | Richard Gasquet | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #93 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #107 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 30–10 | 75.0% | #16 | 1,851 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #18 | 1,922 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #8 | 1,920 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #52 | 1,855 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #30 | 1,892 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #119 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #10 | 2,002 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2020 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #99 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #126 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #9 | 2,127 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2022 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #18 | 1,998 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #31 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 |
| 32 | 2024 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #96 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,933 | 0 | 15 |
| 33 | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #104 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #61 | 1,844 | 0 | 15 |
| 34 | 2026 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #51 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,772 | 0 | 15 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #68 | 1,860 | 0 | 15 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 16 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,620 | 0 | 16 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #313 | 1,636 | 0 | 16 |