H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Yannick Hanfmann vs Roberto Carballes Baena H2H: 1-0
Yannick Hanfmann holds a 1–0 lead over Roberto Carballes Baena in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yannick Hanfmann leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Yannick Hanfmann won the 2023 Santiago fourth round 7-6(6) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 34
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Spain
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2023* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Yannick Hanfmann | 7-6(6) 6-2 | Roberto Carballes Baena | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Hanfmann | #51 | #45 | 974 | 1,865 | 97 | 107 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Roberto Carballes Baena | #165 | #49 | 1,071 | 1,798 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yannick Hanfmann | Roberto Carballes Baena | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #131 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #106 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #119 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #73 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #80 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2020 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #99 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #79 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #126 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2022 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #57 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2024 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #96 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #129 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #104 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2026 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #51 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |