H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Yannick Noah vs Balazs Taroczy H2H: 2-1
Yannick Noah holds a 2–1 lead over Balazs Taroczy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Yannick Noah leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yannick Noah won the 1984 Roland Garros fourth round 3-6 6-2 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 72
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 1984* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Yannick Noah | 3-6 6-2 7-6 7-6 | Balazs Taroczy | Match data |
| Apr 4, 1982* | Nice | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Balazs Taroczy | 6-2 3-6 13-11 | Yannick Noah | Match data |
| Mar 24, 1979* | Nancy | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Yannick Noah | 6-2 6-3 | Balazs Taroczy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Noah | #1,303 | #3 | 1,079 | 2,196 | 456 | 194 | 70.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
| Balazs Taroczy | #732 | #12 | 0 | 2,003 | 381 | 228 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yannick Noah | Balazs Taroczy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #49 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #193 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #18 | 1,887 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1981 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #13 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #69 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1982 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 11 | 1976 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1983 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #5 | 2,085 | 1 | 14 | 1977 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #32 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1984 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #9 | 1,996 | 1 | 14 | 1978 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #20 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1985 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #7 | 1,954 | 1 | 17 | 1979 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #42 | 1,812 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1986 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #4 | 1,994 | 1 | 19 | 1980 | 46–16 | 74.2% | #22 | 1,931 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1987 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #8 | 1,921 | 1 | 21 | 1981 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1988 | 32–10 | 76.2% | #12 | 1,940 | 1 | 22 | 1982 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 13 |
| 29 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,875 | 1 | 22 | 1983 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,781 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | 1990 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #40 | 1,724 | 1 | 23 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #43 | 1,748 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 1991 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,716 | 1 | 23 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #157 | 1,643 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,641 | 0 | 13 |
| 35 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #552 | 1,692 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,678 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |