Yannick Noah
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Lendl | 6 | 10 | 16 | Jan 28, 1990 | H2H |
| Tomas Smid | 8 | 3 | 11 | May 14, 1988 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 5 | 6 | 11 | Mar 20, 1988 | H2H |
| Guy Forget | 7 | 2 | 9 | Feb 15, 1996 | H2H |
| Guillermo Vilas | 2 | 7 | 9 | May 11, 1986 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Bill Scanlon holds a 3–2 lead over Yannick Noah in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Bill Scanlon leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Yannick Noah won the 1989 Miami Open round of 64 4-6 7-5 3-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Noah | 4-6 7-5 3-6 6-1 6-3 | Bill Scanlon | Match data | Mar 22, 1989* | R64 | Miami Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
| Bill Scanlon | 7-5 5-7 7-5 | Yannick Noah | Match data | Aug 20, 1980* | R64 | Cincinnati Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
| Bill Scanlon | 7-5 6-7 6-4 | Yannick Noah | Match data | Apr 19, 1980* | QF | Los Angeles Open | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Bill Scanlon | 5-7 7-6 7-5 | Yannick Noah | Match data | Jan 23, 1980* | R64 | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Yannick Noah | 4-6 6-2 7-6 | Bill Scanlon | Match data | Aug 16, 1979* | R32 | Canadian Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Noah | #1,303 | #3 | 1,079 | 2,199 | 456 | 194 | 70.2% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 23 |
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,018 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yannick Noah | Bill Scanlon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #49 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1979 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #26 | 1,933 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #18 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #13 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1982 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #10 | 2,086 | 0 | 11 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1983 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #5 | 2,087 | 1 | 14 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1984 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #9 | 1,997 | 1 | 14 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1985 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #7 | 1,956 | 1 | 17 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,849 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1986 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #4 | 2,012 | 1 | 19 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,924 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1987 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #8 | 1,951 | 1 | 21 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,829 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1988 | 32–10 | 76.2% | #12 | 1,948 | 1 | 22 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,669 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,876 | 1 | 22 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 1990 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #40 | 1,708 | 1 | 23 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1991 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,708 | 1 | 23 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,535 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,599 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #552 | 1,686 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,672 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Yannick Noah | Bill Scanlon | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 18 | 7 | 25 | 72.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1979 | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1976 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 20 | 1980 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1977 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% |
| 21 | 1981 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 22 | 6 | 28 | 78.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 18 | 4 | 22 | 81.8% | 1978 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% |
| 22 | 1982 | 19 | 1 | 20 | 95.0% | 29 | 7 | 36 | 80.6% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1979 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% |
| 23 | 1983 | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 23 | 2 | 25 | 92.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1980 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 14 | 13 | 27 | 51.9% |
| 24 | 1984 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1981 | 18 | 8 | 26 | 69.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% |
| 25 | 1985 | 21 | 7 | 28 | 75.0% | 20 | 4 | 24 | 83.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1982 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% |
| 26 | 1986 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 17 | 3 | 20 | 85.0% | — | — | — | — | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 1983 | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 18 | 8 | 26 | 69.2% |
| 27 | 1987 | 13 | 2 | 15 | 86.7% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 1984 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% |
| 28 | 1988 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | — | — | — | — | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 1985 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 29 | 1989 | 16 | 8 | 24 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1986 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 30 | 1990 | 16 | 7 | 23 | 69.6% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1987 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 31 | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1988 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1995 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 164 | 62 | 226 | 72.6% | 202 | 66 | 268 | 75.4% | 11 | 16 | 27 | 40.7% | 79 | 50 | 129 | 61.2% | — | 107 | 85 | 192 | 55.7% | 34 | 47 | 81 | 42.0% | 59 | 41 | 100 | 59.0% | 107 | 86 | 193 | 55.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Yannick Noah | Bill Scanlon | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1977 | 1491 | 103.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -2.00 | 0–1 | 2–0 | — | -0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 1709 | 137.9 | — | — | — | — | -111 | +56 | -173 | 57.7% | +0.42 | 7–5 (58%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | +3.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1979 | 1933 | 150.7 | — | — | — | — | -105 | +27 | -371 | 65.1% | +1.08 | 9–4 (69%) | 10–9 (53%) | — | +0.67 | 1976 | 1654 | 142.6 | — | — | — | — | -38 | -5 | — | 48.0% | -0.09 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | -0.46 |
| 20 | 1980 | 1890 | 153.0 | — | — | — | — | +5 | +91 | -340 | 59.5% | +0.98 | 9–6 (60%) | 6–8 (43%) | — | -3.05 | 1977 | 1725 | 137.5 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -86 | -47 | 51.5% | 0.00 | 14–7 (67%) | 10–14 (42%) | — | +2.62 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1917 | 156.5 | — | — | — | — | +62 | +116 | -384 | 64.4% | +1.04 | 17–4 (81%) | 9–12 (43%) | — | -1.67 | 1978 | 1766 | 135.3 | — | — | — | — | +66 | -179 | — | 40.9% | -0.83 | 8–7 (53%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -1.30 |
| 22 | 1982 | 2086 | 164.7 | — | — | — | — | -20 | +30 | — | 74.0% | +1.55 | 12–5 (71%) | 9–6 (60%) | — | -3.56 | 1979 | 1838 | 143.2 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -227 | -82 | 58.0% | +0.56 | 4–6 (40%) | 8–10 (44%) | — | +1.44 |
| 23 | 1983 | 2087 | 162.3 | — | — | — | — | -135 | +184 | — | 74.8% | +1.72 | 7–6 (54%) | 8–4 (67%) | — | -1.85 | 1980 | 1810 | 150.9 | — | — | — | — | +21 | -150 | -29 | 52.8% | +0.11 | 17–12 (59%) | 14–14 (50%) | — | -5.33 |
| 24 | 1984 | 1998 | 159.6 | — | — | — | — | -11 | +206 | — | 65.9% | +0.83 | 8–5 (62%) | 9–3 (75%) | — | -2.14 | 1981 | 1881 | 150.7 | — | — | — | — | +56 | — | -101 | 60.1% | +0.75 | 9–4 (69%) | 9–4 (69%) | — | -0.11 |
| 25 | 1985 | 1957 | 156.2 | — | — | — | — | -10 | +205 | -368 | 68.4% | +1.11 | 12–6 (67%) | 18–12 (60%) | — | -0.87 | 1982 | 1850 | 150.4 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -212 | — | 50.7% | -0.13 | 10–9 (53%) | 11–8 (58%) | — | -0.56 |
| 26 | 1986 | 2013 | 163.9 | — | — | — | — | -41 | +208 | — | 67.8% | +1.19 | 13–5 (72%) | 12–17 (41%) | — | -2.21 | 1983 | 1925 | 157.4 | — | — | — | — | +31 | -244 | -85 | 61.4% | +0.77 | 13–5 (72%) | 11–15 (42%) | — | -3.38 |
| 27 | 1987 | 1951 | 147.7 | — | — | — | — | +93 | +140 | -296 | 65.0% | +1.00 | 11–4 (73%) | 8–9 (47%) | — | +1.55 | 1984 | 1830 | 139.9 | — | — | — | — | -2 | -125 | +21 | 51.6% | +0.34 | 6–4 (60%) | 5–12 (29%) | — | +0.20 |
| 28 | 1988 | 1949 | 153.8 | — | — | — | — | +75 | +116 | — | 67.2% | +1.03 | 12–4 (75%) | 15–11 (58%) | — | -0.74 | 1985 | 1669 | 116.8 | — | — | — | — | +90 | — | +99 | 39.6% | -0.98 | 3–5 (38%) | 8–5 (62%) | — | +0.21 |
| 29 | 1989 | 1877 | 147.3 | — | — | — | — | +46 | — | — | 56.2% | +0.40 | 10–4 (71%) | 10–12 (45%) | — | -0.89 | 1986 | 1657 | 124.4 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | +146 | 50.0% | +0.23 | 4–5 (44%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | +2.27 |
| 30 | 1990 | 1708 | 139.1 | — | — | — | — | +109 | +162 | — | 49.1% | -0.16 | 8–6 (57%) | 10–9 (53%) | — | -1.00 | 1987 | 1562 | 119.1 | — | — | — | — | +53 | — | +169 | 42.7% | -0.44 | 6–2 (75%) | 6–11 (35%) | — | +2.59 |
| 31 | 1991 | 1709 | 127.3 | -0.35 | -2.54 | 0.863 | 47.8% | +60 | +151 | — | 48.5% | -0.48 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–0 | — | -0.03 | 1988 | 1535 | 117.2 | — | — | — | — | +7 | — | +156 | 40.0% | -0.86 | 3–6 (33%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | -0.45 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1600 | 129.3 | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | — | 44.0% | -0.08 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -1.52 |
| 35 | 1995 | 1686 | 117.0 | -0.18 | -0.05 | 0.814 | 46.1% | +61 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.38 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1996 | 1672 | 104.2 | -2.25 | +2.64 | 0.506 | 43.1% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2199 | 161.2 | -0.42 | -1.70 | 0.835 | 47.2% | +9 | +121 | -314 | 64.2% | +0.93 | 138–68 (67%) | 139–119 (54%) | 101.7 | -2.00 | — | 2018 | 148.5 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -134 | +24 | 51.7% | +0.09 | 103–80 (56%) | 99–110 (47%) | 102.8 | -0.67 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Lendl | 6 | 10 | 16 | Jan 28, 1990 | H2H |
| Tomas Smid | 8 | 3 | 11 | May 14, 1988 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 5 | 6 | 11 | Mar 20, 1988 | H2H |
| Guy Forget | 7 | 2 | 9 | Feb 15, 1996 | H2H |
| Guillermo Vilas | 2 | 7 | 9 | May 11, 1986 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John McEnroe | 3 | 9 | 12 | Jul 4, 1984 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 1 | 9 | 10 | Apr 21, 1989 | H2H |
| Wojtek Fibak | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jan 29, 1983 | H2H |
| Andrew Pattison | 6 | 3 | 9 | Jul 29, 1980 | — |
| Guillermo Vilas | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jan 29, 1983 | H2H |