H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Yannick Noah vs Buster C Mottram H2H: 3-1
Yannick Noah holds a 3–1 lead over Buster C Mottram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Yannick Noah leads 2–1 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yannick Noah won the 1983 Memphis fourth round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 1983* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Yannick Noah | 7-5 6-2 | Buster C Mottram | Match data |
| Feb 19, 1982* | La Quinta | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Yannick Noah | 6-3 6-0 | Buster C Mottram | Match data |
| Feb 11, 1982* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Buster C Mottram | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | Yannick Noah | Match data |
| Jan 28, 1981* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Yannick Noah | 6-0 (ret.) | Buster C Mottram | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Noah | #1,303 | #3 | 1,079 | 2,196 | 456 | 194 | 70.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
| Buster C Mottram | #735 | #15 | 0 | 1,952 | 270 | 177 | 60.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yannick Noah | Buster C Mottram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #49 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #18 | 1,887 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #33 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #13 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #55 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 11 | 1975 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #34 | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #5 | 2,085 | 1 | 14 | 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #41 | 1,852 | 0 | 3 |
| 1984 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #9 | 1,996 | 1 | 14 | 1977 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 1985 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #7 | 1,954 | 1 | 17 | 1978 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #4 | 1,994 | 1 | 19 | 1979 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #32 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #8 | 1,921 | 1 | 21 | 1980 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 32–10 | 76.2% | #12 | 1,940 | 1 | 22 | 1981 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,773 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,875 | 1 | 22 | 1982 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 3 |
| 1990 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #40 | 1,724 | 1 | 23 | 1983 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 1991 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,716 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #552 | 1,692 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,678 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |