H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Yannick Noah vs Dan Goldie H2H: 1-0
Yannick Noah holds a 1–0 lead over Dan Goldie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yannick Noah leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yannick Noah won the 1986 La Quinta fourth round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 1986* | La Quinta | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Yannick Noah | 6-3 7-6 | Dan Goldie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Noah | #1,303 | #3 | 1,079 | 2,196 | 456 | 194 | 70.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
| Dan Goldie | #738 | #27 | 457 | 1,855 | 122 | 117 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yannick Noah | Dan Goldie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #49 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1979 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #18 | 1,887 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #101 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #13 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 | 1985 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #265 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 11 | 1986 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #113 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #5 | 2,085 | 1 | 14 | 1987 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #9 | 1,996 | 1 | 14 | 1988 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #29 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1985 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #7 | 1,954 | 1 | 17 | 1989 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #67 | 1,735 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1986 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #4 | 1,994 | 1 | 19 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #96 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1987 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #8 | 1,921 | 1 | 21 | 1991 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #181 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1988 | 32–10 | 76.2% | #12 | 1,940 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,875 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #40 | 1,724 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,716 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #552 | 1,692 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,678 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |