H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Yannick Noah vs David Pate H2H: 2-0
Yannick Noah holds a 2–0 lead over David Pate in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yannick Noah leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yannick Noah won the 1990 US Open first round 7-6 6-4 6-7 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1990* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Yannick Noah | 7-6 6-4 6-7 4-6 6-2 | David Pate | Match data |
| Feb 19, 1987* | Indian Wells | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Yannick Noah | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | David Pate | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Noah | #1,303 | #3 | 1,079 | 2,196 | 456 | 194 | 70.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
| David Pate | #911 | #18 | 441 | 1,874 | 181 | 168 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yannick Noah | David Pate | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #49 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1979 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #18 | 1,887 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #13 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 | 1983 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 11 | 1984 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #30 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #5 | 2,085 | 1 | 14 | 1985 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #26 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #9 | 1,996 | 1 | 14 | 1986 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1985 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #7 | 1,954 | 1 | 17 | 1987 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1986 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #4 | 1,994 | 1 | 19 | 1988 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1987 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #8 | 1,921 | 1 | 21 | 1989 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1988 | 32–10 | 76.2% | #12 | 1,940 | 1 | 22 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,875 | 1 | 22 | 1991 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #160 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1990 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #40 | 1,724 | 1 | 23 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #396 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1991 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,716 | 1 | 23 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #514 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #624 | 1,560 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #911 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #552 | 1,692 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,678 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |