H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Yannick Noah vs Kevin Curren H2H: 4-0
Yannick Noah holds a 4–0 lead over Kevin Curren in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Yannick Noah leads 3–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yannick Noah won the 1986 Wembley semifinal 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 1986* | Wembley | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Yannick Noah | 7-5 6-3 | Kevin Curren | Match data |
| Feb 1, 1986* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Yannick Noah | 6-3 7-6 | Kevin Curren | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1982* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Yannick Noah | 6-3 7-6 6-3 | Kevin Curren | Match data |
| Feb 5, 1981* | Richmond Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Yannick Noah | 6-7 6-3 6-4 | Kevin Curren | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Noah | #1,303 | #3 | 1,079 | 2,196 | 456 | 194 | 70.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
| Kevin Curren | #1,179 | #5 | 684 | 2,060 | 339 | 238 | 58.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yannick Noah | Kevin Curren | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #49 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1979 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #18 | 1,887 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #13 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 | 1979 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 11 | 1980 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #5 | 2,085 | 1 | 14 | 1981 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #9 | 1,996 | 1 | 14 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #17 | 1,941 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1985 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #7 | 1,954 | 1 | 17 | 1983 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #9 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1986 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #4 | 1,994 | 1 | 19 | 1984 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1987 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #8 | 1,921 | 1 | 21 | 1985 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1988 | 32–10 | 76.2% | #12 | 1,940 | 1 | 22 | 1986 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #18 | 1,886 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,875 | 1 | 22 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #37 | 1,807 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1990 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #40 | 1,724 | 1 | 23 | 1988 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1991 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,716 | 1 | 23 | 1989 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #20 | 1,793 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #71 | 1,791 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #58 | 1,700 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #147 | 1,653 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #552 | 1,692 | 1 | 23 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,631 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,678 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |