H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Yannick Noah vs Mark Dickson H2H: 3-1

Yannick Noah holds a 3–1 lead over Mark Dickson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Yannick Noah leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Yannick Noah won the 1985 Toulouse round of 16 7-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yannick Noah
FRA Age 66 Right-Handed 194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Mark Dickson
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yannick Noah #8 7-6 6-1 Mark Dickson #50 Match data Oct 11, 1985* R16 Toulouse ATP 250 Hard
Mark Dickson #52 6-3 7-5 Yannick Noah #12 Match data Nov 24, 1984* QF Toulouse ATP 250 Hard
Yannick Noah #6 6-4 4-6 6-2 1-6 6-1 Mark Dickson #44 Match data May 30, 1984* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Yannick Noah #7 7-6 6-3 Mark Dickson #38 Match data Feb 17, 1983* R32 Memphis ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Yannick Noah #1,303 #3 1,079 2,199 456 194 70.2% 1 0 0 1 21 23
Mark Dickson #1,095 #32 0 1,818 128 118 52.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yannick Noah Mark Dickson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1977 0–1 0.0% #269 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1978 23–14 62.2% #49 1,708 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 1979 34–14 70.8% #26 1,933 0 5 — — — — — — —
20 1980 29–16 64.4% #18 1,890 0 5 — — — — — — —
21 1981 51–18 73.9% #13 1,917 0 7 1981 1–3 25.0% — 1,501 0 0
22 1982 50–12 80.6% #10 2,086 0 11 1982 14–13 51.9% #41 1,688 0 0
23 1983 36–9 80.0% #5 2,087 1 14 1983 28–27 50.9% #66 1,699 0 0
24 1984 23–10 69.7% #9 1,997 1 14 1984 36–22 62.1% #35 1,812 0 2
25 1985 50–17 74.6% #7 1,956 1 17 1985 23–23 50.0% #74 1,717 0 2
26 1986 43–14 75.4% #4 2,012 1 19 1986 8–11 42.1% #131 1,613 0 2
27 1987 34–13 72.3% #8 1,951 1 21 1987 9–10 47.4% #155 1,619 0 2
28 1988 32–10 76.2% #12 1,948 1 22 1988 9–9 50.0% #141 1,624 0 2
29 1989 21–14 60.0% #16 1,876 1 22 — — — — — — —
30 1990 22–21 51.2% #40 1,708 1 23 — — — — — — —
31 1991 7–7 50.0% #188 1,708 1 23 — — — — — — —
35 1995 1–3 25.0% #552 1,686 1 23 — — — — — — —
36 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,672 1 23 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yannick Noah Mark Dickson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1979 13 5 18 72.2% 16 4 20 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 11 5 16 68.8% 14 5 19 73.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1981 10 6 16 62.5% 22 6 28 78.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 18 4 22 81.8% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 1982 19 1 20 95.0% 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0%
23 1983 9 4 13 69.2% 23 2 25 92.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1983 7 4 11 63.6% 11 12 23 47.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 7 16 56.3%
24 1984 9 3 12 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1984 13 6 19 68.4% 14 8 22 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3%
25 1985 21 7 28 75.0% 20 4 24 83.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1985 6 10 16 37.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4%
26 1986 15 5 20 75.0% 17 3 20 85.0% — — — — 11 6 17 64.7% 1986 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
27 1987 13 2 15 86.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 1987 3 4 7 42.9% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
28 1988 9 3 12 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 9 2 11 81.8% 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
29 1989 16 8 24 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 16 7 23 69.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 164 62 226 72.6% 202 66 268 75.4% 11 16 27 40.7% 79 50 129 61.2% — 43 41 84 51.2% 43 39 82 52.4% 11 8 19 57.9% 31 30 61 50.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yannick Noah Mark Dickson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1977 1491 103.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -2.00 0–1 2–0 — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1978 1709 137.9 — — — — -111 +56 -173 57.7% +0.42 7–5 (58%) 10–6 (63%) — +3.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1979 1933 150.7 — — — — -105 +27 -371 65.1% +1.08 9–4 (69%) 10–9 (53%) — +0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 1890 153.0 — — — — +5 +91 -340 59.5% +0.98 9–6 (60%) 6–8 (43%) — -3.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1981 1917 156.5 — — — — +62 +116 -384 64.4% +1.04 17–4 (81%) 9–12 (43%) — -1.67 1981 1501 116.6 — — — — — +36 — 30.0% -1.00 1–1 0–1 — -0.12
22 1982 2086 164.7 — — — — -20 +30 — 74.0% +1.55 12–5 (71%) 9–6 (60%) — -3.56 1982 1689 143.1 — — — — +21 -140 — 50.8% +0.20 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.03
23 1983 2087 162.3 — — — — -135 +184 — 74.8% +1.72 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) — -1.85 1983 1699 149.0 — — — — +76 -61 -176 51.8% +0.23 6–9 (40%) 12–13 (48%) — -1.74
24 1984 1998 159.6 — — — — -11 +206 — 65.9% +0.83 8–5 (62%) 9–3 (75%) — -2.14 1984 1812 143.4 — — — — +12 -64 — 58.3% +0.53 16–13 (55%) 10–10 (50%) — +2.51
25 1985 1957 156.2 — — — — -10 +205 -368 68.4% +1.11 12–6 (67%) 18–12 (60%) — -0.87 1985 1718 135.5 — — — — -39 -4 -56 51.4% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 8–10 (44%) — -0.14
26 1986 2013 163.9 — — — — -41 +208 — 67.8% +1.19 13–5 (72%) 12–17 (41%) — -2.21 1986 1614 109.2 — — — — -4 +68 — 48.9% -0.47 2–7 (22%) 5–1 (83%) — +2.89
27 1987 1951 147.7 — — — — +93 +140 -296 65.0% +1.00 11–4 (73%) 8–9 (47%) — +1.55 1987 1619 119.2 — — — — +3 +34 — 49.0% -0.06 5–6 (45%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.68
28 1988 1949 153.8 — — — — +75 +116 — 67.2% +1.03 12–4 (75%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.74 1988 1625 120.2 — — — — -46 +29 +71 52.4% +0.10 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.23
29 1989 1877 147.3 — — — — +46 — — 56.2% +0.40 10–4 (71%) 10–12 (45%) — -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 1708 139.1 — — — — +109 +162 — 49.1% -0.16 8–6 (57%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 1709 127.3 -0.35 -2.54 0.863 47.8% +60 +151 — 48.5% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1995 1686 117.0 -0.18 -0.05 0.814 46.1% +61 — — 25.0% -1.38 — 1–1 — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1996 1672 104.2 -2.25 +2.64 0.506 43.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2199 161.2 -0.42 -1.70 0.835 47.2% +9 +121 -314 64.2% +0.93 138–68 (67%) 139–119 (54%) 101.7 -2.00 — 1819 142.5 — — — — +11 -32 -54 52.5% +0.17 40–52 (43%) 47–46 (51%) 97.9 +1.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.