H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Yannick Noah vs Pat Dupre H2H: 2-3
Pat Dupre holds a 3–2 lead over Yannick Noah in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Pat Dupre leads 2–0 on carpet, while Yannick Noah leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Yannick Noah won the 1983 Roland Garros third round 7-5 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
3
5 main draw meetings
USA
Age 71
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1983* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Yannick Noah | 7-5 7-6 6-2 | Pat Dupre | Match data |
| Oct 28, 1982* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Pat Dupre | 7-6 7-6 | Yannick Noah | Match data |
| Jul 10, 1981* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Yannick Noah | 7-6 6-3 | Pat Dupre | Match data |
| Jul 1, 1979* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Pat Dupre | 7-5 1-6 6-3 6-1 | Yannick Noah | Match data |
| Nov 18, 1978* | Taipei | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Pat Dupre | 6-4 6-3 | Yannick Noah | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Noah | #1,303 | #3 | 1,079 | 2,196 | 456 | 194 | 70.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
| Pat Dupre | #796 | #14 | 0 | 1,982 | 179 | 198 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yannick Noah | Pat Dupre | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #49 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #215 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #228 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #18 | 1,887 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,410 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #13 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 11 | 1977 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #5 | 2,085 | 1 | 14 | 1978 | 41–30 | 57.7% | #33 | 1,834 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #9 | 1,996 | 1 | 14 | 1979 | 47–30 | 61.0% | #18 | 1,889 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #7 | 1,954 | 1 | 17 | 1980 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #67 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #4 | 1,994 | 1 | 19 | 1981 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #44 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1987 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #8 | 1,921 | 1 | 21 | 1982 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1988 | 32–10 | 76.2% | #12 | 1,940 | 1 | 22 | 1983 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #86 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,875 | 1 | 22 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #320 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1990 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #40 | 1,724 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,716 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #552 | 1,692 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,678 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |