H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Yannick Noah vs Peter Fleming H2H: 0-1
Peter Fleming holds a 1–0 lead over Yannick Noah in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Fleming leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Fleming won the 1983 Montreal / Toronto fourth round 7-5 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 71
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 1983* | Montreal / Toronto | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Peter Fleming | 7-5 2-6 6-1 | Yannick Noah | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Noah | #1,303 | #3 | 1,079 | 2,196 | 456 | 194 | 70.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
| Peter Fleming | #933 | #8 | 0 | 2,046 | 224 | 214 | 51.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yannick Noah | Peter Fleming | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #49 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #18 | 1,887 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #120 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #13 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #116 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 11 | 1977 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #47 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #5 | 2,085 | 1 | 14 | 1978 | 43–31 | 58.1% | #26 | 1,953 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #9 | 1,996 | 1 | 14 | 1979 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #13 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1985 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #7 | 1,954 | 1 | 17 | 1980 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #37 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1986 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #4 | 1,994 | 1 | 19 | 1981 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #99 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1987 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #8 | 1,921 | 1 | 21 | 1982 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1988 | 32–10 | 76.2% | #12 | 1,940 | 1 | 22 | 1983 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #32 | 1,765 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,875 | 1 | 22 | 1984 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #51 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1990 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #40 | 1,724 | 1 | 23 | 1985 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1991 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,716 | 1 | 23 | 1986 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #103 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #174 | 1,561 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #552 | 1,692 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,678 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |