H2H data updated: 2026-10-18 00:00 UTC

Yannick Noah vs Tom Gullikson H2H: 1-1

Yannick Noah and Tom Gullikson are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Yannick Noah won the 1985 Miami Open round of 32 7-5 6-1.

FRA Age 66 Right-Handed 194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
USA Age 75 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yannick Noah #8 7-5 6-1 Tom Gullikson Match data Feb 7, 1985* R32 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard
Tom Gullikson 7-6 7-5 Yannick Noah #35 Match data Aug 22, 1979* R64 Cincinnati Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Yannick Noah #1,303 #3 1,079 2,199 456 194 70.2% 1 0 0 1 21 23
Tom Gullikson — — — 1,826 — — — 0 0 0 0 1 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yannick Noah Tom Gullikson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1977 0–1 0.0% #269 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1978 23–14 62.2% #49 1,708 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 1979 34–14 70.8% #26 1,933 0 5 — — — — — — —
20 1980 29–16 64.4% #18 1,889 0 5 — — — — — — —
21 1981 51–18 73.9% #13 1,917 0 7 — — — — — — —
22 1982 50–12 80.6% #10 2,086 0 11 — — — — — — —
23 1983 36–9 80.0% #5 2,087 1 14 — — — — — — —
24 1984 23–10 69.7% #9 1,997 1 14 — — — — — — —
25 1985 50–17 74.6% #7 1,956 1 17 — — — — — — —
26 1986 43–14 75.4% #4 2,012 1 19 — — — — — — —
27 1987 34–13 72.3% #8 1,951 1 21 — — — — — — —
28 1988 32–10 76.2% #12 1,948 1 22 — — — — — — —
29 1989 21–14 60.0% #16 1,876 1 22 — — — — — — —
30 1990 22–21 51.2% #40 1,708 1 23 — — — — — — —
31 1991 7–7 50.0% #188 1,708 1 23 — — — — — — —
35 1995 1–3 25.0% #552 1,686 1 23 — — — — — — —
36 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,672 1 23 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yannick Noah Tom Gullikson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1979 13 5 18 72.2% 16 4 20 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 11 5 16 68.8% 14 5 19 73.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1981 10 6 16 62.5% 22 6 28 78.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 18 4 22 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1982 19 1 20 95.0% 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1983 9 4 13 69.2% 23 2 25 92.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1984 9 3 12 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1976 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1985 21 7 28 75.0% 20 4 24 83.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
26 1986 15 5 20 75.0% 17 3 20 85.0% — — — — 11 6 17 64.7% 1978 13 7 20 65.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 4 13 69.2% 8 7 15 53.3%
27 1987 13 2 15 86.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 1979 7 10 17 41.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 8 11 27.3%
28 1988 9 3 12 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 9 2 11 81.8% 1980 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 5 11 54.5%
29 1989 16 8 24 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1981 15 10 25 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 1990 16 7 23 69.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1982 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 10 17 41.2%
31 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1983 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 10 6 16 62.5% 2 5 7 28.6%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 5 7 12 41.7%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
35 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 164 62 226 72.6% 202 66 268 75.4% 11 16 27 40.7% 79 50 129 61.2% — 78 81 159 49.1% 20 24 44 45.5% 49 40 89 55.1% 45 59 104 43.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yannick Noah Tom Gullikson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1977 1491 103.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -2.00 0–1 2–0 — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1978 1709 137.9 — — — — -111 +56 -173 57.7% +0.42 7–5 (58%) 10–6 (63%) 105.7 +3.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1979 1933 150.7 — — — — -105 +27 -371 65.1% +1.08 9–4 (69%) 10–9 (53%) 105.8 +0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 1890 153.0 — — — — +5 +91 -340 59.5% +0.98 9–6 (60%) 6–8 (43%) 97.9 -3.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1981 1917 156.5 — — — — +62 +116 -384 64.4% +1.04 17–4 (81%) 9–12 (43%) 104.8 -1.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1982 2086 164.7 — — — — -20 +30 — 74.0% +1.55 12–5 (71%) 9–6 (60%) 104.2 -3.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1983 2087 162.3 — — — — -135 +184 — 74.8% +1.72 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) 98.9 -1.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1984 1998 159.6 — — — — -11 +206 — 65.9% +0.83 8–5 (62%) 9–3 (75%) 100.8 -2.14 1976 1496 107.3 — — — — +59 +42 — 45.5% -0.30 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 95.6 +2.32
25 1985 1957 156.2 — — — — -10 +205 -368 68.4% +1.11 12–6 (67%) 18–12 (60%) 100.2 -0.87 1977 1642 135.7 — — — — +20 -32 -131 44.0% -0.73 4–7 (36%) 9–6 (60%) 103.1 -0.47
26 1986 2013 163.9 — — — — -41 +207 — 67.8% +1.19 13–5 (72%) 12–17 (41%) 99.8 -2.21 1978 1817 146.1 — — — — +23 -219 -132 57.9% +0.54 9–7 (56%) 6–7 (46%) 103.2 -0.21
27 1987 1951 147.7 — — — — +93 +140 -296 65.0% +1.00 11–4 (73%) 8–9 (47%) 99.7 +1.55 1979 1715 150.4 — — — — +5 -74 -3 45.0% +0.19 3–8 (27%) 4–11 (27%) 92.0 -3.00
28 1988 1949 153.8 — — — — +75 +116 — 67.2% +1.03 12–4 (75%) 15–11 (58%) 99.1 -0.74 1980 1712 135.7 — — — — +29 -86 -79 45.1% -0.35 6–7 (46%) 8–8 (50%) 98.1 -1.36
29 1989 1877 147.3 — — — — +46 — — 56.2% +0.40 10–4 (71%) 10–12 (45%) 98.9 -0.89 1981 1775 142.4 — — — — +5 — -157 52.7% +0.14 5–5 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 100.2 -1.24
30 1990 1708 139.1 — — — — +109 +162 — 49.1% -0.16 8–6 (57%) 10–9 (53%) 95.3 -1.00 1982 1779 139.9 — — — — +7 — -161 49.4% +0.04 3–5 (38%) 5–12 (29%) 92.6 -0.80
31 1991 1709 127.3 -0.35 -2.54 0.863 47.8% +60 +151 — 48.5% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.03 1983 1730 125.9 — — — — -34 — -17 51.6% +0.21 14–9 (61%) 7–10 (41%) 101.0 +1.09
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1700 136.7 — — — — -25 — +44 51.6% +0.22 4–8 (33%) 11–18 (38%) 95.1 +0.24
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1722 129.9 — — — — -60 — +143 49.4% -0.07 10–3 (77%) 9–8 (53%) 106.2 -1.17
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1707 122.6 — — — — -53 — +96 36.5% -0.87 4–3 (57%) 6–6 (50%) 102.6 -1.61
35 1995 1686 117.0 -0.18 -0.05 0.814 46.1% +61 — — 25.0% -1.38 — 1–1 — -0.54 1987 1677 99.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 — — +0.07
36 1996 1672 104.2 -2.25 +2.64 0.506 43.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2199 161.1 -0.42 -1.70 0.835 47.2% +9 +121 -314 64.2% +0.93 138–68 (67%) 139–119 (54%) 101.7 -2.00 — 1826 143.4 — — — — -1 -74 -16 49.1% -0.01 64–66 (49%) 75–98 (43%) 96.9 -1.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.