H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Yannick Noah vs Tom Okker H2H: 0-1
Tom Okker holds a 1–0 lead over Yannick Noah in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tom Okker leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tom Okker won the 1978 Wimbledon second round 6-2 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 82
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 1978* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Tom Okker | 6-2 6-3 6-2 | Yannick Noah | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Noah | #1,303 | #3 | 1,079 | 2,196 | 456 | 194 | 70.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
| Tom Okker | #438 | #3 | 0 | 2,198 | 672 | 279 | 70.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 37 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yannick Noah | Tom Okker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #49 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1979 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #18 | 1,887 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #13 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1982 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1983 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #5 | 2,085 | 1 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1984 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #9 | 1,996 | 1 | 14 | 1968 | 89–23 | 79.5% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1985 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #7 | 1,954 | 1 | 17 | 1969 | 86–25 | 77.5% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 15 |
| 26 | 1986 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #4 | 1,994 | 1 | 19 | 1970 | 59–27 | 68.6% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 20 |
| 27 | 1987 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #8 | 1,921 | 1 | 21 | 1971 | 74–31 | 70.5% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 22 |
| 28 | 1988 | 32–10 | 76.2% | #12 | 1,940 | 1 | 22 | 1972 | 69–31 | 69.0% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 23 |
| 29 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,875 | 1 | 22 | 1973 | 91–23 | 79.8% | #4 | 2,166 | 0 | 30 |
| 30 | 1990 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #40 | 1,724 | 1 | 23 | 1974 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #6 | 2,061 | 0 | 33 |
| 31 | 1991 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,716 | 1 | 23 | 1975 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #11 | 2,068 | 0 | 35 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #23 | 1,956 | 0 | 35 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,931 | 0 | 36 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,879 | 0 | 36 |
| 35 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #552 | 1,692 | 1 | 23 | 1979 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,772 | 0 | 37 |
| 36 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,678 | 1 | 23 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #107 | 1,715 | 0 | 37 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 37 |