H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Yannick Noah vs Udo Riglewski H2H: 1-0

Yannick Noah holds a 1–0 lead over Udo Riglewski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yannick Noah leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Yannick Noah won the 1989 ABN AMRO Open quarterfinal 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yannick Noah
FRA Age 66 Right-Handed 194 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Udo Riglewski
GER Age 60 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yannick Noah #13 6-1 7-5 Udo Riglewski #117 Match data Feb 11, 1989* QF ABN AMRO Open ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Yannick Noah #1,303 #3 1,079 2,199 456 194 70.2% 1 0 0 1 21 23
Udo Riglewski #1,274 #82 394 1,657 43 79 35.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yannick Noah Udo Riglewski
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1977 0–1 0.0% #269 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1978 23–14 62.2% #49 1,708 0 2 1985 2–2 50.0% #204 1,537 0 0
19 1979 34–14 70.8% #26 1,933 0 5 1986 1–2 33.3% #371 1,531 0 0
20 1980 29–16 64.4% #18 1,890 0 5 1987 1–2 33.3% #338 1,533 0 0
21 1981 51–18 73.9% #13 1,917 0 7 1988 4–10 28.6% #93 1,502 0 0
22 1982 50–12 80.6% #10 2,086 0 11 1989 9–16 36.0% #142 1,532 0 0
23 1983 36–9 80.0% #5 2,087 1 14 1990 15–23 39.5% #88 1,611 0 0
24 1984 23–10 69.7% #9 1,997 1 14 1991 10–20 33.3% #170 1,586 0 0
25 1985 50–17 74.6% #7 1,956 1 17 1992 1–2 33.3% #369 1,589 0 0
26 1986 43–14 75.4% #4 2,012 1 19 1993 0–1 0.0% #578 1,578 0 0
27 1987 34–13 72.3% #8 1,951 1 21 1994 0–1 0.0% #1153 1,561 0 0
28 1988 32–10 76.2% #12 1,948 1 22 — — — — — — —
29 1989 21–14 60.0% #16 1,876 1 22 — — — — — — —
30 1990 22–21 51.2% #40 1,708 1 23 — — — — — — —
31 1991 7–7 50.0% #188 1,708 1 23 — — — — — — —
35 1995 1–3 25.0% #552 1,686 1 23 — — — — — — —
36 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,672 1 23 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yannick Noah Udo Riglewski
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
19 1979 13 5 18 72.2% 16 4 20 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1986 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1980 11 5 16 68.8% 14 5 19 73.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
21 1981 10 6 16 62.5% 22 6 28 78.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 18 4 22 81.8% 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 1982 19 1 20 95.0% 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 1989 2 5 7 28.6% 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
23 1983 9 4 13 69.2% 23 2 25 92.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1990 3 7 10 30.0% 6 12 18 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
24 1984 9 3 12 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1991 3 7 10 30.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
25 1985 21 7 28 75.0% 20 4 24 83.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1992 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1986 15 5 20 75.0% 17 3 20 85.0% — — — — 11 6 17 64.7% 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1987 13 2 15 86.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1988 9 3 12 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1989 16 8 24 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 16 7 23 69.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 164 62 226 72.6% 202 66 268 75.4% 11 16 27 40.7% 79 50 129 61.2% — 10 25 35 28.6% 18 39 57 31.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 13 12 25 52.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yannick Noah Udo Riglewski
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1977 1491 103.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -2.00 0–1 2–0 — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1978 1709 137.9 — — — — -111 +56 -173 57.7% +0.42 7–5 (58%) 10–6 (63%) — +3.56 1985 1537 116.0 — — — — — +28 — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — -0.32
19 1979 1933 150.7 — — — — -105 +27 -371 65.1% +1.08 9–4 (69%) 10–9 (53%) — +0.67 1986 1532 106.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.12 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.19
20 1980 1890 153.0 — — — — +5 +91 -340 59.5% +0.98 9–6 (60%) 6–8 (43%) — -3.05 1987 1534 108.4 — — — — — +28 — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — -0.15
21 1981 1917 156.5 — — — — +62 +116 -384 64.4% +1.04 17–4 (81%) 9–12 (43%) — -1.67 1988 1502 110.6 — — — — +1 +31 — 40.0% -0.92 2–5 (29%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.39
22 1982 2086 164.7 — — — — -20 +30 — 74.0% +1.55 12–5 (71%) 9–6 (60%) — -3.56 1989 1533 131.1 — — — — +10 -9 — 39.7% -0.53 6–7 (46%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.10
23 1983 2087 162.3 — — — — -135 +184 — 74.8% +1.72 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) — -1.85 1990 1612 128.6 — — — — +22 -69 — 43.6% -0.65 7–7 (50%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.06
24 1984 1998 159.6 — — — — -11 +206 — 65.9% +0.83 8–5 (62%) 9–3 (75%) — -2.14 1991 1586 127.0 -1.02 -2.59 0.872 47.3% +35 -53 — 35.2% -1.06 3–4 (43%) 5–10 (33%) — -2.04
25 1985 1957 156.2 — — — — -10 +205 -368 68.4% +1.11 12–6 (67%) 18–12 (60%) — -0.87 1992 1589 110.7 -1.97 -1.31 0.813 45.5% — — — 33.3% -1.67 — 1–0 — -0.28
26 1986 2013 163.9 — — — — -41 +208 — 67.8% +1.19 13–5 (72%) 12–17 (41%) — -2.21 1993 1579 104.4 +1.76 +0.80 0.847 45.4% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.07
27 1987 1951 147.7 — — — — +93 +140 -296 65.0% +1.00 11–4 (73%) 8–9 (47%) — +1.55 1994 1562 99.1 +1.49 -2.59 0.716 42.5% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.09
28 1988 1949 153.8 — — — — +75 +116 — 67.2% +1.03 12–4 (75%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1989 1877 147.3 — — — — +46 — — 56.2% +0.40 10–4 (71%) 10–12 (45%) — -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 1708 139.1 — — — — +109 +162 — 49.1% -0.16 8–6 (57%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 1709 127.3 -0.35 -2.54 0.863 47.8% +60 +151 — 48.5% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1995 1686 117.0 -0.18 -0.05 0.814 46.1% +61 — — 25.0% -1.38 — 1–1 — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1996 1672 104.2 -2.25 +2.64 0.506 43.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2199 161.2 -0.42 -1.70 0.835 47.2% +9 +121 -314 64.2% +0.93 138–68 (67%) 139–119 (54%) 101.7 -2.00 — 1657 130.6 -0.95 -2.38 0.859 47.0% +22 -27 — 40.1% -0.75 18–27 (40%) 25–27 (48%) 100.0 -1.66

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.