H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Yen-Hsun Lu vs Arnaud Clement H2H: 1-0
Yen-Hsun Lu holds a 1–0 lead over Arnaud Clement in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yen-Hsun Lu leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Yen-Hsun Lu won the 2005 Wimbledon first round 7-6(4) 0-6 6-1 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2005* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Yen-Hsun Lu | 7-6(4) 0-6 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Arnaud Clement | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Arnaud Clement | #576 | #10 | 2,025 | 1,972 | 300 | 313 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yen-Hsun Lu | Arnaud Clement | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #104 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #18 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #17 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #31 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #106 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #54 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #93 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #63 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #295 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 |