H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Yen-Hsun Lu vs Denis Istomin H2H: 1-2
Denis Istomin holds a 2–1 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Denis Istomin leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Yen-Hsun Lu won the 2014 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2015 | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | Q2 | Grass | Yen-Hsun Lu | 7-6(6) 7-6(5) | Denis Istomin | Match data |
| Aug 12, 2014* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Yen-Hsun Lu | 6-3 6-4 | Denis Istomin | Match data |
| Jul 26, 2013* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Denis Istomin | 7-5 6-2 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2012* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Denis Istomin | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Denis Istomin | #1,509 | #33 | 1,217 | 1,900 | 191 | 245 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yen-Hsun Lu | Denis Istomin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #102 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #73 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #43 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #45 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #61 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #121 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #177 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,577 | 0 | 2 |