H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Yen-Hsun Lu vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 0-3
Ernests Gulbis holds a 3–0 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ernests Gulbis leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ernests Gulbis won the 2014 Acapulco third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
LAT
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2014* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Ernests Gulbis | 6-1 6-1 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Aug 12, 2012 | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Yen-Hsun Lu | 6-3 6-2 | Ernests Gulbis | Match data |
| Mar 13, 2011* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ernests Gulbis | 6-7(1) 7-6(7) 6-1 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Jul 30, 2009* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ernests Gulbis | 7-5 6-2 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ernests Gulbis | #893 | #10 | 2,725 | 2,139 | 221 | 232 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yen-Hsun Lu | Ernests Gulbis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #141 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #90 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #24 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #136 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #24 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 |
| 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #81 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 |
| 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,785 | 0 | 6 |
| 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #199 | 1,716 | 0 | 6 |
| 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #95 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 |
| 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #226 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,562 | 0 | 6 |
| 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,509 | 0 | 6 |