H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Yen-Hsun Lu vs Federico Delbonis H2H: 1-0
Yen-Hsun Lu holds a 1–0 lead over Federico Delbonis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yen-Hsun Lu leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Yen-Hsun Lu won the 2014 Monte Carlo Masters second round 7-6(5) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 35
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2014* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Yen-Hsun Lu | 7-6(5) 6-1 | Federico Delbonis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Federico Delbonis | #939 | #33 | 1,435 | 1,905 | 158 | 195 | 44.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yen-Hsun Lu | Federico Delbonis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #166 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #55 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #60 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #68 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #80 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #76 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #125 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,599 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |