H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Yen-Hsun Lu vs Janko Tipsarevic H2H: 1-2
Janko Tipsarevic holds a 2–1 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Janko Tipsarevic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yen-Hsun Lu won the 2012 Queen's Club fourth round 6-3 2-6 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2012* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R16 | Grass | Yen-Hsun Lu | 6-3 2-6 7-6(5) | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
| Mar 29, 2008* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Janko Tipsarevic | 6-1 4-6 6-4 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Jun 24, 2005* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Janko Tipsarevic | 2-6 6-3 6-2 4-6 7-5 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Janko Tipsarevic | #755 | #8 | 3,320 | 2,072 | 245 | 240 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yen-Hsun Lu | Janko Tipsarevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #117 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #139 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #49 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #9 | 2,006 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 48–26 | 64.9% | #9 | 1,972 | 0 | 3 |
| 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #410 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #144 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #105 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #219 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |