H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Yen-Hsun Lu vs Jarkko Nieminen H2H: 3-0
Yen-Hsun Lu holds a 3–0 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Yen-Hsun Lu leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Yen-Hsun Lu won the 2012 Miami Masters first round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
FIN
Age 44
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2012* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Yen-Hsun Lu | 6-4 6-3 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Jun 9, 2011* | Halle | ATP 500 | R32 | Grass | Yen-Hsun Lu | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Feb 4, 2010* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Yen-Hsun Lu | 6-3 6-2 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jarkko Nieminen | #1,029 | #13 | 1,700 | 1,917 | 357 | 334 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yen-Hsun Lu | Jarkko Nieminen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #61 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #77 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 49–27 | 64.5% | #15 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #153 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |