H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Yen-Hsun Lu vs Jo-Wilfried Tsonga H2H: 0-1
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga holds a 1–0 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga won the 2011 US Open first round 6-4 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2011* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | 6-4 6-4 6-4 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | #296 | #5 | 5,230 | 2,208 | 445 | 228 | 66.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 18 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yen-Hsun Lu | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #6 | 1,994 | 0 | 2 |
| 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #10 | 1,976 | 0 | 5 |
| 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,974 | 0 | 5 |
| 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #6 | 2,161 | 0 | 7 |
| 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 9 |
| 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #10 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 |
| 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 2,070 | 0 | 11 |
| 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 12 |
| 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #12 | 2,141 | 0 | 12 |
| 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #15 | 2,007 | 0 | 16 |
| 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #239 | 1,922 | 0 | 16 |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #29 | 1,970 | 0 | 18 |
| 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #62 | 1,910 | 0 | 18 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #263 | 1,740 | 0 | 18 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #296 | 1,686 | 0 | 18 |