H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Yen-Hsun Lu vs Leander Paes H2H: 1-0
Yen-Hsun Lu holds a 1–0 lead over Leander Paes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yen-Hsun Lu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yen-Hsun Lu won the 2005 Chennai third round 6-2 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2005* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Yen-Hsun Lu | 6-2 7-6(5) | Leander Paes | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Leander Paes | #1,102 | #73 | 611 | 1,727 | 48 | 74 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yen-Hsun Lu | Leander Paes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #122 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #91 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #188 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1032 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |