H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Yen-Hsun Lu vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 1-2
Lukas Rosol holds a 2–1 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lukas Rosol leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lukas Rosol won the 2015 Geneva third round 1-6 7-6(1) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2015* | Geneva | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Lukas Rosol | 1-6 7-6(1) 7-5 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Aug 22, 2014* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Lukas Rosol | 7-5 4-6 6-4 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Sep 27, 2013* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Yen-Hsun Lu | 6-3 6-2 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lukas Rosol | #1,777 | #26 | 1,290 | 1,921 | 110 | 148 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yen-Hsun Lu | Lukas Rosol | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #73 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #55 | 1,846 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #203 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #180 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |