H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Yen-Hsun Lu vs Mate Pavic H2H: 1-0

Yen-Hsun Lu holds a 1–0 lead over Mate Pavic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yen-Hsun Lu leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Yen-Hsun Lu won the 2014 Halle Open first round 7-6(2) 6-7(11) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yen-Hsun Lu
TPE Age 43 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Mate Pavic
CRO Age 33 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yen-Hsun Lu #48 7-6(2) 6-7(11) 7-6(5) Mate Pavic #515 Match data Jun 12, 2014* R32 Halle Open ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Yen-Hsun Lu #991 #33 1,244 1,856 145 228 38.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mate Pavic #974 #295 150 1,607 3 10 23.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yen-Hsun Lu Mate Pavic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #835 1,480 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 2–2 50.0% #369 1,485 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2013 0–3 0.0% #412 1,458 0 0
20 2004 4–10 28.6% #87 1,455 0 0 2014 1–2 33.3% #423 1,578 0 0
21 2005 3–8 27.3% #158 1,529 0 0 2015 0–1 0.0% #638 1,525 0 0
22 2006 2–7 22.2% #89 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2007 6–14 30.0% #110 1,500 0 0 2017 0–1 0.0% #933 1,538 0 0
24 2008 9–14 39.1% #64 1,601 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2009 9–22 29.0% #98 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2010 15–20 42.9% #35 1,708 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2011 11–20 35.5% #82 1,709 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2012 12–18 40.0% #59 1,737 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2013 17–18 48.6% #65 1,765 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2014 24–23 51.1% #38 1,795 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2015 16–22 42.1% #77 1,828 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2016 7–9 43.8% #64 1,801 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2017 9–14 39.1% #71 1,703 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2020 0–2 0.0% #1008 1,673 0 0 — — — — — — —
37 2021 1–7 12.5% #568 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yen-Hsun Lu Mate Pavic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2014 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2005 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2015 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2006 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 6 11 17 35.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 8 16 24 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 10 16 26 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 7 14 21 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 13 14 27 48.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 20 17 37 54.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 12 16 28 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 9 12 21 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 112 170 282 39.7% 5 20 25 20.0% 27 37 64 42.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 360/373 of Yen-Hsun Lu's and 12/13 of Mate Pavic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Yen-Hsun Lu Mate Pavic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 1/1 0.0 2.0 50.9% 53.6% 33.3% 28.6% 33.3% 43.6% 33.3%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/4 5.7 2.3 67.2% 70.3% 50.2% 85.7% 66.7% 63.5% 36.5%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 3/3 2.3 2.7 57.0% 53.5% 47.4% 43.9% 43.3% 51.0% 34.3%
20 2004 13/14 4.2 3.8 60.4% 70.4% 50.3% 56.7% 29.5% 62.4% 32.7% 2014 3/3 12.3 3.0 66.7% 70.3% 41.6% 63.3% 50.0% 61.0% 26.4%
21 2005 10/11 5.6 4.3 58.4% 72.2% 46.4% 47.1% 48.4% 61.6% 35.8% 2015 1/1 3.0 0.0 69.4% 70.0% 50.0% 40.0% 16.7% 63.9% 32.5%
22 2006 8/9 3.9 2.9 61.6% 71.6% 51.5% 45.1% 56.4% 63.7% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 20/20 4.0 4.1 59.5% 67.6% 46.0% 56.1% 33.4% 58.9% 34.4% 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 47.1% 62.5% 22.2% 33.3% — 41.2% 15.8%
24 2008 20/23 4.3 4.8 60.2% 69.2% 49.2% 59.3% 33.6% 61.2% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 31/31 3.2 3.5 61.3% 67.3% 46.3% 53.9% 39.1% 59.1% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 35/35 5.3 3.1 59.4% 70.3% 51.7% 57.9% 36.2% 62.7% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 31/31 3.2 3.7 60.9% 67.9% 49.4% 57.6% 43.8% 60.5% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 29/30 4.5 3.8 60.4% 69.7% 50.4% 55.5% 40.3% 62.1% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 34/35 3.9 3.2 62.7% 70.1% 54.1% 54.1% 43.0% 64.0% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 45/47 3.8 3.0 64.1% 71.7% 52.7% 64.1% 40.4% 64.8% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 37/38 4.8 2.4 57.8% 70.8% 51.5% 52.9% 40.1% 62.8% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 15/16 6.3 3.5 59.8% 71.6% 52.3% 54.3% 38.4% 63.8% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 23/23 5.2 3.9 58.5% 73.0% 53.6% 54.8% 41.6% 65.1% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 2/2 3.0 3.5 54.9% 62.8% 44.4% 54.5% 12.5% 54.6% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 7/8 2.1 3.0 65.1% 60.2% 45.7% 43.7% 53.6% 55.2% 29.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 360/373 4.3 3.4 60.7% 69.9% 50.6% 56.0% 39.9% 62.2% 35.4% — 12/13 5.4 2.3 61.7% 64.0% 43.6% 56.7% 44.2% 56.3% 31.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yen-Hsun Lu Mate Pavic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1480 101.1 +1.17 -6.25 0.591 39.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.03
18 2002 1485 100.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1486 104.6 -0.26 -1.09 0.999 51.4% — — — 66.7% +0.83 — 1–1 — -0.08
19 2003 1442 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1459 108.1 -1.71 -1.14 0.701 42.5% — — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — -0.24
20 2004 1456 111.8 -0.90 -1.80 0.870 47.4% -24 — +127 32.4% -1.03 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.23 2014 1579 103.6 -1.43 -4.51 0.676 46.6% — — +169 42.9% -0.43 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.24
21 2005 1529 105.2 -1.75 -1.63 0.935 48.5% -92 — — 37.9% -0.52 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.76 2015 1525 105.4 -1.95 -1.64 0.901 47.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.16
22 2006 1490 101.0 -1.09 -2.45 0.929 48.0% -60 — +138 23.8% -1.57 0–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.44 2016 1516 104.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 1501 120.4 -3.97 -1.15 0.837 46.6% -1 — — 31.8% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.38 2017 1538 100.7 -0.48 -3.72 0.268 27.8% — — — — — — — — -0.05
24 2008 1601 125.7 -1.79 -1.16 0.883 47.9% +17 — -89 47.4% -0.54 2–5 (29%) 10–2 (83%) — +0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 1587 133.7 -2.87 -1.18 0.858 47.1% +17 -132 -72 36.8% -0.97 4–8 (33%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 1708 134.3 -0.60 -0.59 0.948 48.8% -66 — 0 44.0% -0.57 4–4 (50%) 9–6 (60%) — +1.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 1710 133.3 -2.05 -2.16 0.853 47.4% -62 -270 +28 41.1% -0.77 1–5 (17%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 1738 140.5 -0.67 -1.75 0.905 48.3% +2 — -20 42.5% -0.41 5–4 (56%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 1765 147.8 +0.73 +1.97 1.108 51.5% -3 -266 -12 51.2% +0.26 3–8 (27%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2014 1795 150.6 +0.13 +0.10 1.003 50.0% +19 -310 -17 52.4% +0.03 6–5 (55%) 11–9 (55%) — +1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2015 1828 152.3 -0.89 +0.91 0.976 49.4% +7 -314 -2 47.7% -0.12 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) — -1.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 1801 147.0 +1.01 -0.51 0.941 49.3% -24 — — 47.5% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 3–3 (50%) — -1.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1703 133.4 +0.54 +0.75 1.087 51.1% -1 — — 43.5% +0.03 2–5 (29%) 3–8 (27%) — +1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 1674 106.0 -0.99 -1.90 0.714 43.3% — — — 16.7% -2.84 0–1 — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1612 125.4 -3.24 -0.96 0.665 43.1% +37 — — 15.0% -2.25 — 0–2 — -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1856 144.1 -0.96 -0.49 0.937 48.7% -10 -262 +8 42.8% -0.48 33–63 (34%) 77–73 (51%) 97.0 +0.38 — 1608 106.8 -0.96 -2.65 0.711 44.6% — — +169 33.3% -1.13 0–2 3–4 (43%) — +0.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.