H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Yen-Hsun Lu vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 0-3
Mikhail Youzhny holds a 3–0 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mikhail Youzhny leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2013 Miami Masters second round 6-3 1-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2015 | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Yen-Hsun Lu | 2-6 6-2 6-4 | Mikhail Youzhny | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2013* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-3 1-6 6-0 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Mar 26, 2011* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 6-1 6-0 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2007* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 7-5 6-4 6-4 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mikhail Youzhny | #115 | #8 | 3,500 | 2,069 | 477 | 405 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yen-Hsun Lu | Mikhail Youzhny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #32 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #16 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #24 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 |
| 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,960 | 0 | 5 |
| 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 7 |
| 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 |
| 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 0 | 10 |
| 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #48 | 1,795 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,701 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #57 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,679 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #115 | 1,637 | 0 | 10 |