H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Yen-Hsun Lu vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 0-1
Nicolas Almagro holds a 1–0 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Almagro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2009 Auckland fourth round 6-7(4) 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2009* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Nicolas Almagro | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-2 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicolas Almagro | #846 | #9 | 2,735 | 2,076 | 385 | 272 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yen-Hsun Lu | Nicolas Almagro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #103 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #32 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 34–16 | 68.0% | #18 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 |
| 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 5 |
| 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 7 |
| 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #10 | 1,874 | 0 | 10 |
| 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #11 | 2,010 | 0 | 12 |
| 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #13 | 1,961 | 0 | 12 |
| 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #71 | 1,928 | 0 | 12 |
| 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,795 | 0 | 12 |
| 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,790 | 0 | 13 |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #151 | 1,833 | 0 | 13 |
| 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #846 | 1,777 | 0 | 13 |