H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Yen-Hsun Lu vs Pablo Andujar H2H: 1-1
Yen-Hsun Lu and Pablo Andujar are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pablo Andujar leads 1–0 on clay, while Yen-Hsun Lu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yen-Hsun Lu won the 2013 Winston-Salem third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2013* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Yen-Hsun Lu | 6-4 6-3 | Pablo Andujar | Match data |
| May 23, 2013* | Nice | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Pablo Andujar | 6-2 6-0 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2006 | US Open | Grand Slam | Q1 | Hard | Pablo Andujar | 6-7(3) 6-3 6-3 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pablo Andujar | #1,102 | #32 | 1,205 | 1,862 | 164 | 240 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yen-Hsun Lu | Pablo Andujar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #146 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #160 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #46 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #42 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 18–31 | 36.7% | #48 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 |
| 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #64 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #432 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 |
| 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,659 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #60 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #91 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #121 | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,518 | 0 | 4 |