H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Yen-Hsun Lu vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 1-2
Radek Stepanek holds a 2–1 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Radek Stepanek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Yen-Hsun Lu won the 2016 Chengdu third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2016* | Chengdu | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Yen-Hsun Lu | 6-3 6-4 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2008* | San Jose | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Radek Stepanek | 6-2 7-6(5) | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
| Jun 11, 2004* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Radek Stepanek | 6-2 6-4 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Radek Stepanek | #492 | #8 | 2,700 | 2,034 | 366 | 283 | 56.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yen-Hsun Lu | Radek Stepanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #542 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #46 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 44–19 | 69.8% | #12 | 2,010 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 |
| 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #44 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 |
| 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #68 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #197 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #107 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #354 | 1,900 | 0 | 5 |