H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Yen-Hsun Lu vs Razvan Sabau H2H: 0-1
Razvan Sabau holds a 1–0 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Razvan Sabau leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Razvan Sabau won the 2006 Indianapolis second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 49
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2006 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Razvan Sabau | 6-3 6-4 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Razvan Sabau | #1,609 | #74 | 500 | 1,530 | 17 | 43 | 28.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yen-Hsun Lu | Razvan Sabau | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #521 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #342 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #254 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,403 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #149 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #112 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #182 | 1,407 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |