H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Yen-Hsun Lu vs Robin Haase H2H: 1-1
Yen-Hsun Lu and Robin Haase are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Robin Haase leads 1–0 on clay, while Yen-Hsun Lu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yen-Hsun Lu won the 2015 Winston-Salem second round 7-6(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2015* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Yen-Hsun Lu | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Robin Haase | Match data |
| May 18, 2011* | Nice | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Robin Haase | 6-3 6-4 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Robin Haase | #1,206 | #33 | 1,220 | 1,860 | 202 | 255 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Yen-Hsun Lu | Robin Haase | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #114 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #116 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #65 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #56 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 |
| 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #83 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #66 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #59 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #42 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #50 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #162 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #230 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #756 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 |