H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC

Yen-Hsun Lu vs Sam Querrey H2H: 1-3

Sam Querrey holds a 3–1 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sam Querrey leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Yen-Hsun Lu won the 2021 Miami Open first round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yen-Hsun Lu
TPE Age 43 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Sam Querrey
USA Age 39 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yen-Hsun Lu #1020 6-3 6-4 Sam Querrey #63 Match data Mar 26, 2021* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Sam Querrey #28 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 7-5 Yen-Hsun Lu #64 Match data Aug 29, 2012* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Sam Querrey #26 6-3 6-4 Yen-Hsun Lu #74 Match data Aug 18, 2009* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Sam Querrey #129 7-6(10) 6-4 Yen-Hsun Lu #91 Match data Jan 28, 2007 RR Delray Beach Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Yen-Hsun Lu #991 #33 1,244 1,856 145 228 38.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sam Querrey #529 #11 2,595 2,038 372 316 54.1% 0 0 0 2 8 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yen-Hsun Lu Sam Querrey
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2006 6–11 35.3% #130 1,541 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2007 19–22 46.3% #63 1,637 0 0
20 2004 4–10 28.6% #87 1,455 0 0 2008 28–24 53.8% #39 1,778 0 1
21 2005 3–8 27.3% #158 1,529 0 0 2009 39–22 63.9% #25 1,900 0 2
22 2006 2–7 22.2% #89 1,489 0 0 2010 35–21 62.5% #18 1,872 0 6
23 2007 6–14 30.0% #110 1,500 0 0 2011 12–13 48.0% #93 1,817 0 6
24 2008 9–14 39.1% #64 1,601 0 0 2012 37–24 60.7% #22 2,005 0 7
25 2009 9–22 29.0% #98 1,587 0 0 2013 25–21 54.3% #46 1,875 0 7
26 2010 15–20 42.9% #35 1,708 0 0 2014 26–20 56.5% #35 1,896 0 7
27 2011 11–20 35.5% #82 1,709 0 0 2015 20–24 45.5% #59 1,812 0 7
28 2012 12–18 40.0% #59 1,737 0 0 2016 28–23 54.9% #31 1,797 0 8
29 2013 17–18 48.6% #65 1,765 0 0 2017 35–20 63.6% #13 1,944 0 10
30 2014 24–23 51.1% #38 1,795 0 0 2018 21–22 48.8% #51 1,823 0 10
31 2015 16–22 42.1% #77 1,828 0 0 2019 24–17 58.5% #44 1,898 0 10
32 2016 7–9 43.8% #64 1,801 0 0 2020 3–6 33.3% #53 1,818 0 10
33 2017 9–14 39.1% #71 1,703 0 0 2021 10–16 38.5% #108 1,689 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 2022 4–10 28.6% #329 1,644 0 10
36 2020 0–2 0.0% #1008 1,673 0 0 — — — — — — —
37 2021 1–7 12.5% #568 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yen-Hsun Lu Sam Querrey
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 18 14 32 56.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2004 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2008 23 16 39 59.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2005 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 30 14 44 68.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
22 2006 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 19 14 33 57.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
23 2007 6 11 17 35.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
24 2008 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2012 28 16 44 63.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
25 2009 8 16 24 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2013 21 14 35 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2010 10 16 26 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2014 16 14 30 53.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
27 2011 7 14 21 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2015 8 15 23 34.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
28 2012 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2016 16 14 30 53.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
29 2013 13 14 27 48.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2017 23 13 36 63.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
30 2014 20 17 37 54.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2018 16 16 32 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
31 2015 12 16 28 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2019 13 14 27 48.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
32 2016 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2020 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2017 9 12 21 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2021 2 9 11 18.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
36 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 112 170 282 39.7% 5 20 25 20.0% 27 37 64 42.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — 250 210 460 54.3% 44 57 101 43.6% 78 47 125 62.4% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 360/373 of Yen-Hsun Lu's and 684/688 of Sam Querrey's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Yen-Hsun Lu Sam Querrey
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 17/17 11.4 3.2 57.2% 75.9% 49.8% 62.8% 42.9% 64.6% 34.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 41/41 12.4 3.2 56.6% 79.2% 48.3% 59.9% 39.4% 65.8% 33.9%
20 2004 13/14 4.2 3.8 60.4% 70.4% 50.3% 56.7% 29.5% 62.4% 32.7% 2008 51/52 10.2 3.2 59.1% 74.3% 49.1% 61.1% 41.2% 64.2% 35.5%
21 2005 10/11 5.6 4.3 58.4% 72.2% 46.4% 47.1% 48.4% 61.6% 35.8% 2009 61/61 11.8 3.0 59.4% 80.0% 53.4% 60.4% 44.4% 69.2% 36.2%
22 2006 8/9 3.9 2.9 61.6% 71.6% 51.5% 45.1% 56.4% 63.7% 33.7% 2010 56/56 12.3 3.4 61.5% 79.4% 50.9% 64.4% 45.2% 68.3% 35.1%
23 2007 20/20 4.0 4.1 59.5% 67.6% 46.0% 56.1% 33.4% 58.9% 34.4% 2011 25/25 8.9 3.2 59.6% 74.8% 51.2% 66.6% 31.2% 65.2% 34.4%
24 2008 20/23 4.3 4.8 60.2% 69.2% 49.2% 59.3% 33.6% 61.2% 34.2% 2012 61/61 11.6 3.9 57.6% 80.5% 51.1% 60.0% 42.0% 68.1% 36.0%
25 2009 31/31 3.2 3.5 61.3% 67.3% 46.3% 53.9% 39.1% 59.1% 35.1% 2013 45/46 12.8 3.6 59.6% 78.6% 48.7% 57.6% 35.7% 66.5% 33.6%
26 2010 35/35 5.3 3.1 59.4% 70.3% 51.7% 57.9% 36.2% 62.7% 35.3% 2014 45/46 14.4 2.8 60.5% 79.4% 51.9% 73.7% 41.8% 68.7% 33.8%
27 2011 31/31 3.2 3.7 60.9% 67.9% 49.4% 57.6% 43.8% 60.5% 33.7% 2015 44/44 13.8 3.6 59.5% 78.7% 54.4% 64.0% 37.1% 68.9% 33.7%
28 2012 29/30 4.5 3.8 60.4% 69.7% 50.4% 55.5% 40.3% 62.1% 34.3% 2016 51/51 13.1 3.1 58.6% 79.9% 52.3% 59.4% 39.6% 68.5% 33.4%
29 2013 34/35 3.9 3.2 62.7% 70.1% 54.1% 54.1% 43.0% 64.0% 39.9% 2017 55/55 13.5 3.2 57.1% 79.8% 51.8% 62.5% 49.5% 67.9% 37.0%
30 2014 45/47 3.8 3.0 64.1% 71.7% 52.7% 64.1% 40.4% 64.8% 35.3% 2018 43/43 14.3 3.7 58.2% 81.9% 51.7% 60.0% 41.2% 69.3% 34.2%
31 2015 37/38 4.8 2.4 57.8% 70.8% 51.5% 52.9% 40.1% 62.8% 36.3% 2019 41/41 16.8 4.0 62.1% 81.2% 49.4% 60.5% 33.2% 69.1% 33.8%
32 2016 15/16 6.3 3.5 59.8% 71.6% 52.3% 54.3% 38.4% 63.8% 34.1% 2020 9/9 16.8 3.6 60.3% 78.2% 50.8% 33.4% 31.7% 67.5% 31.1%
33 2017 23/23 5.2 3.9 58.5% 73.0% 53.6% 54.8% 41.6% 65.1% 37.9% 2021 25/26 15.2 5.2 56.8% 81.9% 47.7% 52.4% 33.2% 67.3% 30.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 14/14 12.4 4.7 58.3% 78.6% 46.1% 56.3% 26.6% 64.8% 29.4%
36 2020 2/2 3.0 3.5 54.9% 62.8% 44.4% 54.5% 12.5% 54.6% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 7/8 2.1 3.0 65.1% 60.2% 45.7% 43.7% 53.6% 55.2% 29.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 360/373 4.3 3.4 60.7% 69.9% 50.6% 56.0% 39.9% 62.2% 35.4% — 684/688 12.9 3.5 59.0% 79.2% 50.9% 61.3% 40.2% 67.6% 34.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yen-Hsun Lu Sam Querrey
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1490 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2002 1485 100.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1542 124.2 +1.62 -2.01 0.962 49.2% -13 — — 46.7% -0.31 1–7 (13%) 2–4 (33%) 94.5 -0.03
19 2003 1442 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1637 141.5 +2.16 -1.29 0.990 50.0% +50 -158 — 47.6% -0.08 6–8 (43%) 9–10 (47%) 98.4 +0.09
20 2004 1456 111.8 -0.90 -1.80 0.870 47.4% -24 — +127 32.4% -1.03 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.23 2008 1779 145.5 +1.02 -0.70 0.993 50.1% +29 -209 -254 51.5% +0.04 11–8 (58%) 9–8 (53%) 103.2 +0.64
21 2005 1529 105.2 -1.75 -1.63 0.935 48.5% -92 — — 37.9% -0.52 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.76 2009 1900 149.0 +4.79 +0.01 1.176 52.3% +27 -361 -223 62.0% +0.61 8–11 (42%) 13–12 (52%) 97.3 +1.27
22 2006 1490 101.0 -1.09 -2.45 0.929 48.0% -60 — +138 23.8% -1.57 0–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.44 2010 1873 152.2 +3.95 -0.55 1.108 51.9% +5 -250 +9 58.4% +0.58 13–11 (54%) 14–17 (45%) 102.5 +2.65
23 2007 1501 120.4 -3.97 -1.15 0.837 46.6% -1 — — 31.8% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 100.2 +0.38 2011 1817 141.7 +1.37 -1.06 0.989 49.9% +19 -173 +81 46.7% -0.10 3–4 (43%) 4–7 (36%) 95.5 +0.50
24 2008 1601 125.7 -1.79 -1.16 0.883 47.9% +17 — -89 47.4% -0.54 2–5 (29%) 10–2 (83%) 104.7 +0.73 2012 2006 157.4 +4.09 +0.39 1.129 52.1% +3 -305 -92 57.8% +0.40 12–10 (55%) 20–13 (61%) 105.3 -0.61
25 2009 1587 133.7 -2.87 -1.18 0.858 47.1% +17 -132 -72 36.8% -0.97 4–8 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 102.4 -0.68 2013 1875 153.6 +2.58 -2.07 1.003 50.0% +71 -164 -51 50.0% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 15–15 (50%) 95.5 +0.18
26 2010 1708 134.3 -0.60 -0.59 0.948 48.8% -66 — 0 44.0% -0.57 4–4 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 105.4 +1.46 2014 1896 144.5 +3.69 -2.25 1.080 51.0% +17 -178 -23 56.4% +0.33 6–9 (40%) 12–12 (50%) 94.1 +0.27
27 2011 1710 133.3 -2.05 -2.16 0.853 47.4% -62 -270 +28 41.1% -0.77 1–5 (17%) 7–5 (58%) 99.2 -1.26 2015 1812 152.4 +3.52 -1.09 1.082 51.0% -39 -68 +110 46.7% -0.02 7–9 (44%) 13–18 (42%) 96.7 -2.68
28 2012 1738 140.5 -0.67 -1.75 0.905 48.3% +2 — -20 42.5% -0.41 5–4 (56%) 8–8 (50%) 100.3 -0.01 2016 1797 152.8 +4.13 -1.97 1.060 50.9% -38 -84 +223 56.0% +0.27 8–9 (47%) 18–16 (53%) 100.2 +1.80
29 2013 1765 147.8 +0.73 +1.97 1.108 51.5% -3 -266 -12 51.2% +0.26 3–8 (27%) 6–8 (43%) 95.1 +0.45 2017 1945 161.8 +4.11 +1.06 1.153 52.3% -43 -192 +131 59.1% +0.70 11–6 (65%) 14–13 (52%) 107.0 +1.92
30 2014 1795 150.6 +0.13 +0.10 1.003 50.0% +19 -310 -17 52.4% +0.03 6–5 (55%) 11–9 (55%) 103.4 +1.57 2018 1823 152.3 +4.08 -0.93 1.114 51.7% -5 -127 +252 54.1% +0.58 6–11 (35%) 9–20 (31%) 90.6 +1.23
31 2015 1828 152.3 -0.89 +0.91 0.976 49.4% +7 -314 -2 47.7% -0.12 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) 98.3 -1.54 2019 1898 146.9 +4.59 -1.49 1.095 51.3% -82 -158 +201 55.6% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 18–15 (55%) 100.8 -0.90
32 2016 1801 147.0 +1.01 -0.51 0.941 49.3% -24 — — 47.5% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 3–3 (50%) 94.9 -1.76 2020 1818 128.8 +2.33 -0.47 0.956 48.3% -33 — — 37.0% -0.67 1–1 4–3 (57%) — -0.60
33 2017 1703 133.4 +0.54 +0.75 1.087 51.1% -1 — — 43.5% +0.03 2–5 (29%) 3–8 (27%) 92.8 +1.49 2021 1690 124.0 +2.41 -3.84 0.926 48.7% -54 — +303 39.1% -0.53 3–5 (38%) 8–8 (50%) 95.2 -0.24
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1645 117.4 -0.20 -3.77 0.835 47.4% -72 — +250 28.6% -0.97 2–1 (67%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 +0.03
36 2020 1674 106.0 -0.99 -1.90 0.714 43.3% — — — 16.7% -2.84 0–1 — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1612 125.4 -3.24 -0.96 0.665 43.1% +37 — — 15.0% -2.25 — 0–2 — -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1856 144.1 -0.96 -0.49 0.937 48.7% -10 -262 +8 42.8% -0.48 33–63 (34%) 77–73 (51%) 97.0 +0.38 — 2039 155.6 +3.33 -1.02 1.064 51.0% 0 -181 +77 53.2% +0.22 112–123 (48%) 184–198 (48%) 96.0 +0.81

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.