H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Yen-Hsun Lu vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 0-1

Sergiy Stakhovsky holds a 1–0 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sergiy Stakhovsky leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sergiy Stakhovsky won the 2017 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-4 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yen-Hsun Lu
TPE Age 43 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Sergiy Stakhovsky
UKR Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sergiy Stakhovsky #123 6-3 6-4 7-6(4) Yen-Hsun Lu #60 Match data May 30, 2017* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Yen-Hsun Lu #60 7-5 3-6 6-3 Sergiy Stakhovsky #117 Match data Aug 16, 2009 Q1 Q Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Yen-Hsun Lu #991 #33 1,244 1,856 145 228 38.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sergiy Stakhovsky #678 #31 1,263 1,838 145 196 42.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yen-Hsun Lu Sergiy Stakhovsky
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–1 0.0% #335 1,491 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 3–3 50.0% #184 1,527 0 0
20 2004 4–10 28.6% #87 1,455 0 0 2006 1–2 33.3% #195 1,525 0 0
21 2005 3–8 27.3% #158 1,529 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #199 1,509 0 0
22 2006 2–7 22.2% #89 1,489 0 0 2008 5–4 55.6% #92 1,615 0 1
23 2007 6–14 30.0% #110 1,500 0 0 2009 14–13 51.9% #60 1,751 0 2
24 2008 9–14 39.1% #64 1,601 0 0 2010 24–24 50.0% #46 1,743 0 4
25 2009 9–22 29.0% #98 1,587 0 0 2011 22–26 45.8% #62 1,707 0 4
26 2010 15–20 42.9% #35 1,708 0 0 2012 13–27 32.5% #103 1,737 0 4
27 2011 11–20 35.5% #82 1,709 0 0 2013 10–15 40.0% #98 1,678 0 4
28 2012 12–18 40.0% #59 1,737 0 0 2014 15–19 44.1% #58 1,685 0 4
29 2013 17–18 48.6% #65 1,765 0 0 2015 20–25 44.4% #62 1,715 0 4
30 2014 24–23 51.1% #38 1,795 0 0 2016 6–13 31.6% #109 1,693 0 4
31 2015 16–22 42.1% #77 1,828 0 0 2017 6–8 42.9% #122 1,728 0 4
32 2016 7–9 43.8% #64 1,801 0 0 2018 2–5 28.6% #134 1,650 0 4
33 2017 9–14 39.1% #71 1,703 0 0 2019 3–6 33.3% #150 1,576 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #202 1,568 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2021 1–2 33.3% #220 1,530 0 4
36 2020 0–2 0.0% #1008 1,673 0 0 — — — — — — —
37 2021 1–7 12.5% #568 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yen-Hsun Lu Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
20 2004 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2005 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2007 6 11 17 35.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 12 8 20 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2008 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
25 2009 8 16 24 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2011 12 14 26 46.2% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2010 10 16 26 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2012 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2011 7 14 21 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2012 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
29 2013 13 14 27 48.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 15 16 31 48.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
30 2014 20 17 37 54.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2016 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 2015 12 16 28 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2017 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2016 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2018 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 2017 9 12 21 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2019 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 112 170 282 39.7% 5 20 25 20.0% 27 37 64 42.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — 90 116 206 43.7% 27 48 75 36.0% 24 28 52 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 360/373 of Yen-Hsun Lu's and 340/341 of Sergiy Stakhovsky's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Yen-Hsun Lu Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 1/1 3.0 0.0 75.0% 52.8% 33.3% 37.5% 0.0% 47.9% 26.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 6/6 7.8 2.3 68.1% 69.1% 51.4% 59.4% 48.7% 62.5% 30.3%
20 2004 13/14 4.2 3.8 60.4% 70.4% 50.3% 56.7% 29.5% 62.4% 32.7% 2006 3/3 8.7 3.0 63.9% 69.3% 44.4% 60.4% 28.3% 60.4% 28.8%
21 2005 10/11 5.6 4.3 58.4% 72.2% 46.4% 47.1% 48.4% 61.6% 35.8% 2007 2/2 3.5 2.5 56.3% 61.7% 48.8% 50.0% 25.0% 56.7% 30.6%
22 2006 8/9 3.9 2.9 61.6% 71.6% 51.5% 45.1% 56.4% 63.7% 33.7% 2008 9/9 4.9 2.1 64.2% 72.7% 48.9% 67.9% 38.9% 64.6% 31.6%
23 2007 20/20 4.0 4.1 59.5% 67.6% 46.0% 56.1% 33.4% 58.9% 34.4% 2009 27/27 6.5 2.3 63.7% 71.9% 48.8% 60.8% 43.0% 63.6% 35.5%
24 2008 20/23 4.3 4.8 60.2% 69.2% 49.2% 59.3% 33.6% 61.2% 34.2% 2010 48/48 6.8 2.5 63.4% 71.3% 46.5% 57.4% 34.7% 62.4% 35.6%
25 2009 31/31 3.2 3.5 61.3% 67.3% 46.3% 53.9% 39.1% 59.1% 35.1% 2011 48/48 5.5 1.9 62.0% 70.0% 50.3% 53.4% 40.4% 62.5% 36.8%
26 2010 35/35 5.3 3.1 59.4% 70.3% 51.7% 57.9% 36.2% 62.7% 35.3% 2012 39/40 6.4 3.1 59.5% 71.4% 52.8% 63.8% 36.1% 63.8% 34.7%
27 2011 31/31 3.2 3.7 60.9% 67.9% 49.4% 57.6% 43.8% 60.5% 33.7% 2013 25/25 6.4 2.7 63.1% 70.1% 51.1% 55.3% 37.2% 62.9% 35.6%
28 2012 29/30 4.5 3.8 60.4% 69.7% 50.4% 55.5% 40.3% 62.1% 34.3% 2014 34/34 6.3 3.4 64.2% 72.9% 47.6% 62.6% 43.5% 63.8% 34.9%
29 2013 34/35 3.9 3.2 62.7% 70.1% 54.1% 54.1% 43.0% 64.0% 39.9% 2015 45/45 6.5 2.4 61.9% 71.3% 51.1% 61.8% 35.4% 63.6% 35.1%
30 2014 45/47 3.8 3.0 64.1% 71.7% 52.7% 64.1% 40.4% 64.8% 35.3% 2016 19/19 6.8 4.1 56.6% 71.9% 48.9% 53.3% 39.4% 62.1% 32.7%
31 2015 37/38 4.8 2.4 57.8% 70.8% 51.5% 52.9% 40.1% 62.8% 36.3% 2017 14/14 9.4 2.5 62.2% 75.4% 51.6% 57.0% 39.5% 66.3% 32.9%
32 2016 15/16 6.3 3.5 59.8% 71.6% 52.3% 54.3% 38.4% 63.8% 34.1% 2018 7/7 8.9 3.3 61.6% 69.4% 46.8% 52.2% 21.1% 60.6% 32.9%
33 2017 23/23 5.2 3.9 58.5% 73.0% 53.6% 54.8% 41.6% 65.1% 37.9% 2019 9/9 9.1 2.7 63.5% 71.2% 49.6% 65.1% 39.6% 63.1% 30.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 4.0 3.0 67.1% 58.8% 48.0% 66.7% 100.0% 55.3% 32.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 3/3 9.0 4.3 57.2% 76.8% 51.5% 65.6% 56.1% 66.0% 29.1%
36 2020 2/2 3.0 3.5 54.9% 62.8% 44.4% 54.5% 12.5% 54.6% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 7/8 2.1 3.0 65.1% 60.2% 45.7% 43.7% 53.6% 55.2% 29.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 360/373 4.3 3.4 60.7% 69.9% 50.6% 56.0% 39.9% 62.2% 35.4% — 340/341 6.6 2.7 62.2% 71.3% 49.6% 59.0% 38.3% 63.1% 34.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yen-Hsun Lu Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2002 1485 100.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1492 96.9 +1.37 -0.87 0.503 37.8% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.01
19 2003 1442 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1528 104.8 -1.62 -2.88 0.808 46.3% +15 — — 46.7% -0.53 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.25
20 2004 1456 111.8 -0.90 -1.80 0.870 47.4% -24 — +127 32.4% -1.03 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.23 2006 1525 115.1 +0.53 -0.16 0.727 45.0% -1 — — 37.5% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — -0.41
21 2005 1529 105.2 -1.75 -1.63 0.935 48.5% -92 — — 37.9% -0.52 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.76 2007 1509 105.4 -2.12 -0.77 0.706 43.5% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.11
22 2006 1490 101.0 -1.09 -2.45 0.929 48.0% -60 — +138 23.8% -1.57 0–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.44 2008 1615 119.8 -0.38 -0.29 0.891 48.7% +20 — — 52.6% -0.16 3–0 (100%) 2–0 — -0.41
23 2007 1501 120.4 -3.97 -1.15 0.837 46.6% -1 — — 31.8% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 100.2 +0.38 2009 1751 134.9 -0.48 -0.33 0.976 50.0% +28 -170 -104 51.5% -0.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 105.1 +1.40
24 2008 1601 125.7 -1.79 -1.16 0.883 47.9% +17 — -89 47.4% -0.54 2–5 (29%) 10–2 (83%) 104.7 +0.73 2010 1743 144.9 -0.90 -0.51 0.949 49.4% +38 -194 -15 52.2% -0.02 10–9 (53%) 14–7 (67%) 105.2 -0.67
25 2009 1587 133.7 -2.87 -1.18 0.858 47.1% +17 -132 -72 36.8% -0.97 4–8 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 102.4 -0.68 2011 1708 143.8 -0.30 -0.35 0.981 49.5% +47 -57 -27 45.3% -0.39 6–5 (55%) 12–8 (60%) 103.7 +0.79
26 2010 1708 134.3 -0.60 -0.59 0.948 48.8% -66 — 0 44.0% -0.57 4–4 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 105.4 +1.46 2012 1737 144.8 +0.53 -1.27 0.957 49.3% +40 -119 -83 41.1% -0.43 3–9 (25%) 13–15 (46%) 95.4 -1.40
27 2011 1710 133.3 -2.05 -2.16 0.853 47.4% -62 -270 +28 41.1% -0.77 1–5 (17%) 7–5 (58%) 99.2 -1.26 2013 1678 130.6 -0.70 -1.39 0.958 49.3% +35 -75 +62 46.3% -0.34 1–7 (13%) 6–4 (60%) 95.4 -0.19
28 2012 1738 140.5 -0.67 -1.75 0.905 48.3% +2 — -20 42.5% -0.41 5–4 (56%) 8–8 (50%) 100.3 -0.01 2014 1686 132.7 -0.47 -0.60 0.964 49.2% -20 -108 +86 44.8% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 7–10 (41%) 102.0 -0.26
29 2013 1765 147.8 +0.73 +1.97 1.108 51.5% -3 -266 -12 51.2% +0.26 3–8 (27%) 6–8 (43%) 95.1 +0.45 2015 1716 153.5 -0.56 +0.26 0.966 49.5% +47 -150 -2 46.2% -0.07 8–7 (53%) 6–9 (40%) 102.1 -0.06
30 2014 1795 150.6 +0.13 +0.10 1.003 50.0% +19 -310 -17 52.4% +0.03 6–5 (55%) 11–9 (55%) 103.4 +1.57 2016 1694 134.5 -0.30 -1.40 0.864 47.7% -19 — +108 37.2% -0.77 3–2 (60%) 4–5 (44%) 101.6 -0.26
31 2015 1828 152.3 -0.89 +0.91 0.976 49.4% +7 -314 -2 47.7% -0.12 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) 98.3 -1.54 2017 1728 130.1 +1.63 -2.29 0.977 50.1% -72 -66 — 47.2% -0.17 0–3 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 98.6 -0.83
32 2016 1801 147.0 +1.01 -0.51 0.941 49.3% -24 — — 47.5% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 3–3 (50%) 94.9 -1.76 2018 1650 117.1 -1.87 -0.92 0.835 46.9% — — +170 36.4% -0.86 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
33 2017 1703 133.4 +0.54 +0.75 1.087 51.1% -1 — — 43.5% +0.03 2–5 (29%) 3–8 (27%) 92.8 +1.49 2019 1577 114.4 -0.93 -3.10 0.837 47.7% +2 — +208 34.8% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.2 +0.66
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1569 108.7 -0.29 -0.75 0.732 45.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.10
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1531 99.7 -1.61 -0.72 0.856 48.7% +30 — — 40.0% -0.20 1–1 0–2 — +0.06
36 2020 1674 106.0 -0.99 -1.90 0.714 43.3% — — — 16.7% -2.84 0–1 — — +0.06 2022 1516 98.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2021 1612 125.4 -3.24 -0.96 0.665 43.1% +37 — — 15.0% -2.25 — 0–2 — -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1856 144.1 -0.96 -0.49 0.937 48.7% -10 -262 +8 42.8% -0.48 33–63 (34%) 77–73 (51%) 97.0 +0.38 — 1839 138.5 -0.39 -0.77 0.940 49.1% +25 -108 +39 45.2% -0.32 54–56 (49%) 80–71 (53%) 105.1 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.