H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Yevgeny Kafelnikov vs Alex Antonitsch H2H: 1-0
Yevgeny Kafelnikov holds a 1–0 lead over Alex Antonitsch in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yevgeny Kafelnikov leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Yevgeny Kafelnikov won the 1994 Copenhagen semifinal 7-5 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 1994* | Copenhagen | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 7-5 5-7 6-3 | Alex Antonitsch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | #636 | #1 | 3,917 | 2,071 | 568 | 281 | 66.9% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 25 |
| Alex Antonitsch | #1,272 | #40 | 586 | 1,820 | 100 | 133 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | Alex Antonitsch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #275 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 60–27 | 69.0% | #11 | 1,888 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #217 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 69–27 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,875 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #115 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 73–25 | 74.5% | #3 | 1,972 | 1 | 11 | 1988 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #172 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 14 | 1989 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #11 | 1,950 | 1 | 17 | 1990 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 59–29 | 67.0% | #2 | 1,922 | 2 | 20 | 1991 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 58–31 | 65.2% | #5 | 1,859 | 2 | 21 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #108 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #4 | 1,979 | 2 | 23 | 1993 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #27 | 1,809 | 2 | 25 | 1994 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #140 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2003 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #41 | 1,708 | 2 | 25 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #519 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |