H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Yevgeny Kafelnikov vs Cecil Mamiit H2H: 2-0
Yevgeny Kafelnikov holds a 2–0 lead over Cecil Mamiit in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yevgeny Kafelnikov leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yevgeny Kafelnikov won the 2001 Roland Garros second round 7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
PHI
Age 50
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2001* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 7-6(2) | Cecil Mamiit | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1997* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 5-7 6-1 6-3 | Cecil Mamiit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | #636 | #1 | 3,917 | 2,071 | 568 | 281 | 66.9% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 25 |
| Cecil Mamiit | #1,573 | #72 | 625 | 1,633 | 48 | 95 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | Cecil Mamiit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #275 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 60–27 | 69.0% | #11 | 1,888 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 69–27 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,875 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #229 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 73–25 | 74.5% | #3 | 1,972 | 1 | 11 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 14 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #93 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #11 | 1,950 | 1 | 17 | 2000 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 59–29 | 67.0% | #2 | 1,922 | 2 | 20 | 2001 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #111 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 58–31 | 65.2% | #5 | 1,859 | 2 | 21 | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #4 | 1,979 | 2 | 23 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #183 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #27 | 1,809 | 2 | 25 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #226 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #41 | 1,708 | 2 | 25 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #462 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |