H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Yevgeny Kafelnikov vs Galo Blanco H2H: 2-0
Yevgeny Kafelnikov holds a 2–0 lead over Galo Blanco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yevgeny Kafelnikov leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Yevgeny Kafelnikov won the 1996 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1996* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 6-1 6-3 6-3 | Galo Blanco | Match data |
| Jul 13, 1995* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Galo Blanco | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | #636 | #1 | 3,917 | 2,071 | 568 | 281 | 66.9% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 25 |
| Galo Blanco | #809 | #40 | 963 | 1,750 | 122 | 175 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | Galo Blanco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #275 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 60–27 | 69.0% | #11 | 1,888 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 69–27 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,875 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #82 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 73–25 | 74.5% | #3 | 1,972 | 1 | 11 | 1999 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #75 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 14 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #11 | 1,950 | 1 | 17 | 2001 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #56 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 59–29 | 67.0% | #2 | 1,922 | 2 | 20 | 2002 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #134 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 58–31 | 65.2% | #5 | 1,859 | 2 | 21 | 2003 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #99 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #4 | 1,979 | 2 | 23 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #174 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #27 | 1,809 | 2 | 25 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2003 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #41 | 1,708 | 2 | 25 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #822 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |