H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Yevgeny Kafelnikov vs Gianluca Pozzi H2H: 2-0
Yevgeny Kafelnikov holds a 2–0 lead over Gianluca Pozzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yevgeny Kafelnikov leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yevgeny Kafelnikov won the 2000 Indianapolis fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 61
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2000 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 6-3 6-3 | Gianluca Pozzi | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2000* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 1-6 6-4 6-4 | Gianluca Pozzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | #636 | #1 | 3,917 | 2,071 | 568 | 281 | 66.9% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 25 |
| Gianluca Pozzi | #1,466 | #40 | 864 | 1,783 | 172 | 257 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | Gianluca Pozzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #275 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 60–27 | 69.0% | #11 | 1,888 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 69–27 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,875 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 73–25 | 74.5% | #3 | 1,972 | 1 | 11 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 14 | 1988 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #11 | 1,950 | 1 | 17 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #179 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 59–29 | 67.0% | #2 | 1,922 | 2 | 20 | 1990 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #185 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 58–31 | 65.2% | #5 | 1,859 | 2 | 21 | 1991 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #4 | 1,979 | 2 | 23 | 1992 | 28–28 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #27 | 1,809 | 2 | 25 | 1993 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2003 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #41 | 1,708 | 2 | 25 | 1994 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #93 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #101 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #61 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #155 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |