H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Yevgeny Kafelnikov vs Hugo Armando H2H: 0-1
Hugo Armando holds a 1–0 lead over Yevgeny Kafelnikov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hugo Armando leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hugo Armando won the 2001 Kitzbuhel fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2001* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Hugo Armando | 6-1 6-1 | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | #636 | #1 | 3,917 | 2,071 | 568 | 281 | 66.9% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 25 |
| Hugo Armando | #1,126 | #100 | 403 | 1,581 | 13 | 30 | 30.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | Hugo Armando | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #275 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 60–27 | 69.0% | #11 | 1,888 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 69–27 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,875 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 73–25 | 74.5% | #3 | 1,972 | 1 | 11 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 14 | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #11 | 1,950 | 1 | 17 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 59–29 | 67.0% | #2 | 1,922 | 2 | 20 | 2003 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 58–31 | 65.2% | #5 | 1,859 | 2 | 21 | 2004 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #161 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #4 | 1,979 | 2 | 23 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #178 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #27 | 1,809 | 2 | 25 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #203 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #41 | 1,708 | 2 | 25 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #227 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #458 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |