H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Yevgeny Kafelnikov vs Jacobo Diaz H2H: 0-1
Jacobo Diaz holds a 1–0 lead over Yevgeny Kafelnikov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jacobo Diaz leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jacobo Diaz won the 2001 Rome Masters third round 7-6(3) 1-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 50
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2001* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jacobo Diaz | 7-6(3) 1-6 7-5 | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | #636 | #1 | 3,917 | 2,071 | 568 | 281 | 66.9% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 25 |
| Jacobo Diaz | #833 | #68 | 622 | 1,628 | 28 | 62 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | Jacobo Diaz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #419 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #275 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 60–27 | 69.0% | #11 | 1,888 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #119 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 69–27 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,875 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #145 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 73–25 | 74.5% | #3 | 1,972 | 1 | 11 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #92 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 14 | 2000 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #111 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #11 | 1,950 | 1 | 17 | 2001 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #88 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 59–29 | 67.0% | #2 | 1,922 | 2 | 20 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #396 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 58–31 | 65.2% | #5 | 1,859 | 2 | 21 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #4 | 1,979 | 2 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #27 | 1,809 | 2 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #41 | 1,708 | 2 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |