H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Yevgeny Kafelnikov vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 3-2

Yevgeny Kafelnikov holds a 3–2 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jeff Tarango leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Yevgeny Kafelnikov leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Yevgeny Kafelnikov won the 2001 Milan third round 4-6 6-4 6-2.

RUS Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 1, 2001* Milan ATP 250 R32 Carpet Yevgeny Kafelnikov #7 4-6 6-4 6-2 Jeff Tarango #111 Match data
Mar 21, 1998* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Jeff Tarango #61 3-6 6-3 6-2 Yevgeny Kafelnikov #6 Match data
Mar 23, 1996* St. Petersburg ATP 250 QF Carpet Yevgeny Kafelnikov #7 7-5 6-3 Jeff Tarango #84 Match data
Aug 30, 1995* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Yevgeny Kafelnikov #7 6-0 6-4 7-5 Jeff Tarango #61 Match data
Sep 16, 1994* Bordeaux ATP 250 R16 Hard Jeff Tarango #117 6-0 6-1 Yevgeny Kafelnikov #12 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Yevgeny Kafelnikov #636 #1 3,917 2,071 568 281 66.9% 2 0 0 0 23 25
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yevgeny Kafelnikov Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 1–4 20.0% #275 1,477 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1993 10–10 50.0% #102 1,588 0 0 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1994 60–27 69.0% #11 1,888 0 3 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1995 69–27 71.9% #6 1,875 0 7 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1996 73–25 74.5% #3 1,972 1 11 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1997 54–26 67.5% #5 1,955 1 14 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1998 55–29 65.5% #11 1,950 1 17 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1999 59–29 67.0% #2 1,922 2 20 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 2000 58–31 65.2% #5 1,859 2 21 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 2001 64–26 71.1% #4 1,979 2 23 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 2002 36–23 61.0% #27 1,809 2 25 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 2003 29–24 54.7% #41 1,708 2 25 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2