H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Yevgeny Kafelnikov vs Mats Wilander H2H: 1-1
Yevgeny Kafelnikov and Mats Wilander are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yevgeny Kafelnikov leads 1–0 on carpet, while Mats Wilander leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1995 Canada Masters quarterfinal 7-5 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 52
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 1995* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Mats Wilander | 7-5 7-6(4) | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | Match data |
| Mar 3, 1995* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 6-4 7-6(3) | Mats Wilander | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | #636 | #1 | 3,917 | 2,071 | 568 | 281 | 66.9% | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 25 |
| Mats Wilander | #1,354 | #1 | 1,075 | 2,262 | 526 | 203 | 72.2% | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 33 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yevgeny Kafelnikov | Mats Wilander | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #283 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #73 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 56–16 | 77.8% | #8 | 2,020 | 1 | 4 |
| 18 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #275 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 71–11 | 86.6% | #4 | 2,246 | 2 | 13 |
| 19 | 1993 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 49–12 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,177 | 3 | 16 |
| 20 | 1994 | 60–27 | 69.0% | #11 | 1,888 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,108 | 4 | 19 |
| 21 | 1995 | 69–27 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,875 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #3 | 2,056 | 4 | 21 |
| 22 | 1996 | 73–25 | 74.5% | #3 | 1,972 | 1 | 11 | 1987 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,082 | 4 | 26 |
| 23 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 14 | 1988 | 51–9 | 85.0% | #1 | 2,152 | 7 | 32 |
| 24 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #11 | 1,950 | 1 | 17 | 1989 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #12 | 1,922 | 7 | 32 |
| 25 | 1999 | 59–29 | 67.0% | #2 | 1,922 | 2 | 20 | 1990 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #41 | 1,894 | 7 | 33 |
| 26 | 2000 | 58–31 | 65.2% | #5 | 1,859 | 2 | 21 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #159 | 1,767 | 7 | 33 |
| 27 | 2001 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #4 | 1,979 | 2 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #27 | 1,809 | 2 | 25 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #330 | 1,695 | 7 | 33 |
| 29 | 2003 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #41 | 1,708 | 2 | 25 | 1994 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #129 | 1,652 | 7 | 33 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #46 | 1,766 | 7 | 33 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #196 | 1,679 | 7 | 33 |