Yibing Wu
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 22, 2025 | H2H |
| Carlos Alcaraz | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 4, 2026 | H2H |
| Flavio Cobolli | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 28, 2026 | H2H |
| Andrey Rublev | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jan 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Adrian Mannarino | 2 | 0 | 2 | Sep 20, 2025 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC
Yibing Wu vs Nick Kyrgios H2H: 1-0
Yibing Wu holds a 1–0 lead over Nick Kyrgios in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yibing Wu leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Yibing Wu won the 2023 Stuttgart Open first round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yibing Wu | 7-5 6-3 | Nick Kyrgios | Match data | Jun 15, 2023* | R32 | Stuttgart Open | ATP 250 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yibing Wu | #113 | #54 | 884 | 1,814 | 30 | 40 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nick Kyrgios | #670 | #13 | 2,460 | 2,133 | 197 | 115 | 63.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yibing Wu | Nick Kyrgios | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,933 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #13 | 2,051 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2022 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #116 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,986 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2023 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #121 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #35 | 1,994 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #408 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,942 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2025 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #45 | 1,957 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2026 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #113 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #22 | 2,101 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 2,072 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #671 | 1,973 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #670 | 1,898 | 0 | 7 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Yibing Wu | Nick Kyrgios | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2017 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 27 | 9 | 36 | 75.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 22 | 2022 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 24 | 12 | 36 | 66.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2023 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2018 | 16 | 9 | 25 | 64.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% |
| 24 | 2024 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 18 | 9 | 27 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 25 | 2025 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2026 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2021 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 24 | 7 | 31 | 77.4% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| Career | — | 25 | 26 | 51 | 49.0% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | 135 | 75 | 210 | 64.3% | 27 | 19 | 46 | 58.7% | 35 | 21 | 56 | 62.5% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 70/70 of Yibing Wu's and 303/312 of Nick Kyrgios's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Yibing Wu | Nick Kyrgios | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 2017 | 2/2 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 53.6% | 73.7% | 47.1% | 48.6% | 71.4% | 61.4% | 31.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 5/5 | 4.6 | 2.2 | 59.6% | 70.3% | 46.5% | 47.7% | 56.8% | 60.7% | 36.3% | 2013 | 3/3 | 7.0 | 4.7 | 63.0% | 71.1% | 40.7% | 55.5% | 22.2% | 60.1% | 24.1% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 15/15 | 18.7 | 4.9 | 64.1% | 75.3% | 49.9% | 57.4% | 49.3% | 66.1% | 31.2% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 42/43 | 12.1 | 3.4 | 63.2% | 75.8% | 53.1% | 61.9% | 45.5% | 67.4% | 33.8% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 53/54 | 13.8 | 2.9 | 66.1% | 76.6% | 55.2% | 69.1% | 42.4% | 69.4% | 36.0% |
| 22 | 2022 | 3/3 | 7.0 | 4.3 | 62.8% | 66.8% | 55.8% | 70.0% | 32.6% | 62.7% | 40.1% | 2017 | 43/44 | 12.1 | 3.6 | 63.1% | 80.3% | 56.2% | 66.4% | 42.1% | 71.2% | 35.7% |
| 23 | 2023 | 28/28 | 4.1 | 2.0 | 62.6% | 66.9% | 53.3% | 57.4% | 43.0% | 61.8% | 34.8% | 2018 | 36/37 | 19.8 | 4.8 | 64.7% | 79.0% | 55.1% | 68.1% | 43.3% | 70.5% | 31.0% |
| 24 | 2024 | 5/5 | 3.8 | 1.8 | 61.5% | 74.6% | 48.3% | 70.3% | 35.7% | 64.7% | 36.9% | 2019 | 35/35 | 16.7 | 3.3 | 66.2% | 79.4% | 50.8% | 63.2% | 47.0% | 69.5% | 29.8% |
| 25 | 2025 | 10/10 | 3.6 | 1.9 | 65.5% | 66.1% | 51.9% | 69.0% | 47.6% | 61.3% | 31.2% | 2020 | 5/5 | 21.4 | 3.2 | 74.8% | 77.4% | 46.6% | 66.5% | 48.9% | 69.8% | 27.7% |
| 26 | 2026 | 17/17 | 6.0 | 1.9 | 63.6% | 70.4% | 53.8% | 55.5% | 32.7% | 63.9% | 35.5% | 2021 | 14/14 | 16.1 | 2.6 | 67.0% | 76.4% | 51.1% | 46.0% | 29.7% | 68.1% | 30.4% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 47/52 | 15.9 | 3.4 | 67.6% | 79.6% | 56.8% | 78.1% | 44.8% | 72.3% | 36.0% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1/1 | 15.0 | 5.0 | 69.0% | 75.0% | 38.9% | 33.3% | 0.0% | 63.8% | 27.9% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 5/5 | 11.0 | 3.0 | 69.4% | 72.2% | 46.4% | 58.0% | 21.0% | 63.8% | 28.0% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4/4 | 11.3 | 1.5 | 74.5% | 77.0% | 45.3% | 18.8% | 41.8% | 69.5% | 24.5% |
| Career | — | 70/70 | 4.6 | 2.1 | 62.7% | 68.6% | 52.3% | 59.1% | 42.0% | 62.4% | 34.8% | — | 303/312 | 15.0 | 3.5 | 65.6% | 77.9% | 53.7% | 65.5% | 43.0% | 69.6% | 33.3% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Yibing Wu | Nick Kyrgios | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2017 | 1477 | 103.3 | -0.76 | -2.87 | 0.803 | 46.7% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.16 | 2012 | 1484 | 99.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 1471 | 114.4 | -0.39 | -1.40 | 0.924 | 48.1% | +19 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–2 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.52 | 2013 | 1561 | 115.6 | +2.16 | -1.76 | 0.603 | 43.3% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.78 | — | 3–0 (100%) | — | -0.31 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1772 | 138.9 | +2.23 | -2.06 | 0.922 | 48.9% | -120 | — | +10 | 52.8% | -0.15 | 1–2 (33%) | 13–8 (62%) | 105.1 | -0.61 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1933 | 156.8 | +2.78 | -0.44 | 1.037 | 50.9% | -96 | -215 | -86 | 55.5% | +0.35 | 7–7 (50%) | 17–14 (55%) | 106.8 | -1.27 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2051 | 170.0 | +5.12 | +0.95 | 1.175 | 52.5% | -16 | -165 | -109 | 70.8% | +1.07 | 6–6 (50%) | 18–11 (62%) | 105.5 | -0.41 |
| 22 | 2022 | 1601 | 128.3 | -0.01 | +0.92 | 1.075 | 51.6% | +24 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.27 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.19 | 2017 | 1987 | 171.1 | +6.51 | +1.06 | 1.241 | 53.2% | +52 | -122 | — | 66.3% | +0.87 | 5–6 (45%) | 13–5 (72%) | 102.4 | -0.27 |
| 23 | 2023 | 1707 | 140.1 | -1.32 | -1.50 | 0.910 | 48.8% | +43 | -123 | -144 | 45.7% | -0.50 | 7–4 (64%) | 7–9 (44%) | 102.7 | -2.08 | 2018 | 1995 | 162.0 | +4.96 | -3.05 | 1.051 | 51.0% | +32 | — | -38 | 60.4% | +0.55 | 11–5 (69%) | 17–15 (53%) | 105.6 | -2.23 |
| 24 | 2024 | 1713 | 117.7 | +0.47 | +0.22 | 1.045 | 51.3% | +38 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.88 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.10 | 2019 | 1943 | 155.0 | +4.73 | -3.55 | 0.980 | 50.0% | +52 | -113 | -42 | 57.3% | +0.18 | 8–5 (62%) | 17–11 (61%) | 101.4 | -0.62 |
| 25 | 2025 | 1773 | 135.7 | -1.20 | -1.86 | 0.806 | 47.7% | +32 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.08 | 4–2 (67%) | 2–1 (67%) | 104.2 | -0.85 | 2020 | 1958 | 130.1 | +3.49 | -1.34 | 0.916 | 48.8% | +29 | — | — | 62.5% | +0.88 | 1–0 | 4–4 (50%) | — | -0.20 |
| 26 | 2026 | 1719 | 131.4 | -0.32 | +0.20 | 0.984 | 49.2% | +78 | -131 | — | 47.9% | -0.23 | 0–3 (0%) | 5–3 (63%) | 96.7 | -0.01 | 2021 | 1883 | 134.7 | +1.58 | -1.96 | 0.953 | 48.8% | +29 | — | +43 | 52.5% | -0.17 | 3–2 (60%) | 5–1 (83%) | 102.5 | -0.87 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2102 | 161.6 | +7.56 | +0.72 | 1.301 | 53.8% | -14 | -259 | -15 | 70.6% | +1.23 | 9–4 (69%) | 15–13 (54%) | 104.6 | -2.05 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2073 | 98.0 | -0.96 | -2.34 | 0.772 | 44.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.01 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1973 | 112.8 | -1.40 | -2.24 | 0.773 | 46.2% | +7 | — | — | 23.1% | -1.15 | 1–1 | 1–6 (14%) | — | -0.08 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1899 | 103.0 | -0.39 | -3.77 | 0.803 | 47.5% | — | — | +59 | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.17 |
| Career | — | 1814 | 140.6 | -0.79 | -0.94 | 0.926 | 48.9% | +45 | -125 | -144 | 46.1% | -0.33 | 12–12 (50%) | 17–17 (50%) | 101.7 | -2.81 | — | 2133 | 167.0 | +4.74 | -0.73 | 1.094 | 51.4% | +1 | -182 | -28 | 61.2% | +0.56 | 52–39 (57%) | 123–89 (58%) | 109.3 | -2.89 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Nick Kyrgios
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rafael Nadal | 4 | 6 | 10 | Jul 9, 2022 | H2H |
| Andy Murray | 1 | 6 | 7 | Jun 11, 2022 | H2H |
| Milos Raonic | 3 | 4 | 7 | Jan 16, 2019 | H2H |
| Richard Gasquet | 2 | 5 | 7 | Oct 5, 2018 | H2H |
| Alexander Zverev | 4 | 2 | 6 | Mar 2, 2019 | H2H |