H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Yoshihito Nishioka vs Bernard Tomic H2H: 0-1

Bernard Tomic holds a 1–0 lead over Yoshihito Nishioka in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bernard Tomic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bernard Tomic won the 2015 Delray Beach Open quarterfinal 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Yoshihito Nishioka
Japan Age 30 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Bernard Tomic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bernard Tomic #46 6-3 6-1 Yoshihito Nishioka #154 Match data Feb 21, 2015* QF Delray Beach Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Yoshihito Nishioka #202 #24 1,351 1,929 131 161 44.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Bernard Tomic #179 #17 1,885 1,972 172 184 48.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Yoshihito Nishioka Bernard Tomic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #286 1,526 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2010 2–6 25.0% #208 1,591 0 0
18 2014 0–1 0.0% #166 1,542 0 0 2011 14–14 50.0% #42 1,791 0 0
19 2015 3–5 37.5% #117 1,643 0 0 2012 22–26 45.8% #52 1,756 0 0
20 2016 8–12 40.0% #100 1,716 0 0 2013 21–22 48.8% #51 1,786 0 1
21 2017 9–7 56.2% #166 1,833 0 0 2014 17–16 51.5% #56 1,834 0 2
22 2018 9–11 45.0% #75 1,852 0 1 2015 37–27 57.8% #18 1,914 0 3
23 2019 17–19 47.2% #73 1,843 0 1 2016 28–23 54.9% #26 1,874 0 3
24 2020 12–11 52.2% #56 1,815 0 1 2017 10–20 33.3% #140 1,728 0 3
25 2021 10–21 32.3% #81 1,729 0 1 2018 9–7 56.2% #83 1,745 0 4
26 2022 19–17 52.8% #36 1,856 0 2 2019 7–15 31.8% #185 1,620 0 4
27 2023 20–21 48.8% #47 1,820 0 2 2020 0–1 0.0% #226 1,589 0 4
28 2024 16–19 45.7% #69 1,750 0 3 2021 1–1 50.0% #260 1,608 0 4
29 2025 8–17 32.0% #110 1,705 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — 2025 1–2 33.3% #192 1,592 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2026 2–1 66.7% #179 1,573 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Yoshihito Nishioka Bernard Tomic
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
19 2015 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 15 13 28 53.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 4 4 0.0%
20 2016 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 2017 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — 2014 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2018 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 31 17 48 64.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
23 2019 15 13 28 53.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 19 14 33 57.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
24 2020 10 7 17 58.8% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2017 3 10 13 23.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
25 2021 3 13 16 18.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2018 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2022 19 14 33 57.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2023 15 16 31 48.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2024 11 12 23 47.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 2021 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2025 8 13 21 38.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
Career — 110 118 228 48.2% 17 30 47 36.2% 4 13 17 23.5% — 121 110 231 52.4% 16 43 59 27.1% 35 31 66 53.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 287/292 of Yoshihito Nishioka's and 352/356 of Bernard Tomic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Yoshihito Nishioka Bernard Tomic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 4/4 4.8 3.3 60.2% 56.3% 47.1% 57.1% 24.5% 52.6% 29.2%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 8/8 3.8 3.0 64.3% 65.2% 45.9% 58.2% 34.1% 58.3% 33.8%
18 2014 1/1 1.0 5.0 54.5% 58.3% 33.3% 50.0% — 47.0% 20.0% 2011 28/28 6.5 2.4 65.8% 70.0% 50.1% 63.0% 36.9% 62.9% 34.1%
19 2015 8/8 1.8 2.3 58.9% 59.1% 53.3% 48.5% 27.4% 57.1% 36.9% 2012 47/48 4.8 1.5 65.8% 67.4% 50.2% 57.5% 36.4% 61.4% 35.1%
20 2016 20/20 2.2 2.3 60.3% 69.4% 54.3% 53.3% 40.9% 63.6% 36.7% 2013 43/43 8.0 1.3 66.4% 71.1% 51.3% 64.6% 38.6% 64.4% 32.7%
21 2017 16/16 1.3 2.0 62.8% 66.4% 54.6% 61.8% 47.5% 61.7% 38.3% 2014 32/33 9.3 1.1 67.2% 73.6% 52.5% 58.0% 40.9% 66.8% 33.0%
22 2018 20/20 1.0 2.0 67.8% 59.8% 52.0% 47.9% 35.8% 57.2% 36.5% 2015 63/64 9.1 1.5 66.1% 73.1% 50.9% 66.3% 40.9% 65.5% 34.2%
23 2019 35/36 2.3 1.4 66.4% 62.9% 54.5% 52.4% 49.7% 60.1% 38.2% 2016 51/51 9.4 2.3 65.3% 72.5% 48.8% 59.9% 36.0% 64.4% 33.1%
24 2020 23/23 2.2 1.3 66.8% 63.6% 56.3% 57.1% 36.3% 60.9% 37.7% 2017 29/30 6.9 1.9 66.7% 69.5% 51.7% 60.9% 35.3% 63.3% 31.1%
25 2021 30/31 1.4 1.8 66.6% 62.1% 48.3% 50.4% 32.5% 57.6% 34.3% 2018 16/16 9.4 1.3 67.3% 73.5% 50.8% 61.3% 43.7% 66.0% 35.6%
26 2022 36/36 2.3 1.1 66.9% 63.1% 55.8% 55.3% 45.3% 60.7% 36.1% 2019 22/22 9.1 1.9 64.6% 68.5% 43.9% 56.2% 36.0% 59.5% 29.6%
27 2023 41/41 2.1 1.9 64.0% 64.7% 55.0% 51.9% 41.5% 61.2% 35.0% 2020 1/1 8.0 2.0 68.8% 64.1% 44.8% 76.5% 16.7% 58.1% 31.6%
28 2024 33/35 2.4 1.4 63.2% 66.9% 57.0% 57.2% 47.9% 63.1% 35.0% 2021 2/2 8.0 4.0 58.8% 68.0% 37.1% 65.6% 28.6% 56.1% 34.6%
29 2025 24/25 2.5 2.1 61.1% 68.5% 50.0% 55.8% 36.2% 61.1% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 3/3 5.3 2.0 58.0% 69.0% 48.3% 61.0% 37.7% 59.7% 33.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 3/3 8.3 2.7 63.0% 71.3% 41.3% 46.3% 38.0% 61.0% 40.3%
Career — 287/293 2.0 1.7 64.6% 64.4% 53.9% 53.9% 41.3% 60.6% 35.8% — 352/356 7.9 1.8 65.8% 70.8% 49.9% 61.2% 37.8% 63.5% 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Yoshihito Nishioka Bernard Tomic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1502 94.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1526 105.3 -2.94 -0.81 0.615 41.2% -3 — — 30.8% -2.23 — 3–0 (100%) — -0.09
17 2013 1490 90.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1591 118.9 -1.47 -0.26 0.811 46.8% -52 — +98 34.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.20
18 2014 1543 109.4 +1.14 -3.46 0.377 36.0% — — — — — — — — +0.11 2011 1791 144.2 +0.77 -1.38 0.919 48.9% -92 — +124 51.9% -0.18 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) 110.1 -0.34
19 2015 1644 119.7 -3.46 -0.53 0.861 47.0% -13 — — 36.4% -0.82 1–1 0–2 — +0.03 2012 1757 150.9 -1.11 -0.69 0.907 48.6% +52 -169 +23 46.3% -0.31 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) 102.8 -1.42
20 2016 1716 132.9 -0.81 +0.81 1.008 49.9% +16 — — 39.6% -0.60 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.70 2013 1787 149.3 +0.99 -2.79 0.919 48.8% -8 -226 +96 50.5% -0.09 7–5 (58%) 16–12 (57%) 106.0 -1.00
21 2017 1834 144.6 -1.82 +2.38 0.999 50.4% +15 — — 53.8% +0.13 4–2 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26 2014 1835 142.5 +1.91 -1.36 0.995 49.7% +21 — +30 53.2% +0.01 7–5 (58%) 11–12 (48%) 99.3 -0.73
22 2018 1853 148.4 -3.91 +1.07 0.854 47.2% +44 — — 44.2% -0.65 4–3 (57%) 6–1 (86%) 106.1 -1.77 2015 1915 162.1 +1.61 -0.87 0.990 50.4% +64 -388 -38 57.6% +0.46 12–12 (50%) 18–21 (46%) 98.4 +2.35
23 2019 1844 147.6 -2.51 +1.89 0.959 49.2% +27 -195 — 50.0% -0.21 6–7 (46%) 8–6 (57%) 100.2 -1.58 2016 1875 151.1 +0.69 -2.24 0.928 49.4% +25 -337 +82 57.0% +0.26 9–7 (56%) 12–15 (44%) 98.6 +2.21
24 2020 1816 141.3 -1.50 +1.15 0.964 49.2% +51 -185 — 50.8% -0.15 6–4 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 100.5 -0.25 2017 1728 133.1 -0.38 -4.25 0.846 47.7% -3 -160 +146 36.6% -0.72 4–3 (57%) 4–8 (33%) 98.6 -0.82
25 2021 1730 130.1 -4.82 -0.85 0.809 45.7% -7 -16 -174 34.2% -1.37 6–2 (75%) 7–3 (70%) 107.0 -1.93 2018 1745 126.0 +1.66 -1.18 1.046 50.5% -2 — +164 56.8% +0.20 3–4 (43%) 8–2 (80%) 102.2 +1.42
26 2022 1856 148.9 -1.45 +0.59 0.919 48.9% +50 — — 48.4% -0.16 9–4 (69%) 9–7 (56%) 106.5 -0.18 2019 1621 132.2 -3.23 -3.79 0.733 45.7% +73 -101 +197 34.0% -1.08 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 -0.65
27 2023 1821 145.5 -1.84 -0.11 0.901 48.2% +18 -79 — 47.7% -0.46 10–6 (63%) 8–9 (47%) 101.4 -0.26 2020 1590 103.5 -0.93 -0.44 0.755 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03
28 2024 1751 140.1 -1.21 -0.13 0.948 49.2% +8 -42 -147 49.4% -0.19 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) 103.8 -0.24 2021 1608 104.1 -1.59 +0.30 0.788 46.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09
29 2025 1705 132.6 -1.89 -3.28 0.809 46.9% +30 — — 36.2% -0.95 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 99.7 -1.21 2022 1577 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2026 1669 100.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1563 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1593 108.5 -0.49 -2.98 0.826 46.7% — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — -0.04
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1574 107.6 -0.78 +0.98 1.034 51.0% +28 — — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.24
Career — 1929 146.9 -2.19 +0.24 0.908 48.3% +25 -91 -159 45.4% -0.47 58–43 (57%) 57–45 (56%) 107.6 -2.38 — 1973 147.3 +0.35 -1.82 0.915 48.9% +19 -225 +90 49.9% -0.13 59–53 (53%) 98–89 (52%) 105.0 +0.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.