H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Yoshihito Nishioka vs Tatsuma Ito H2H: 0-1
Tatsuma Ito holds a 1–0 lead over Yoshihito Nishioka in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatsuma Ito leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatsuma Ito won the 2015 Tokyo third round 3-6 6-0 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 30
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2015* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Tatsuma Ito | 3-6 6-0 7-5 | Yoshihito Nishioka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yoshihito Nishioka | #177 | #24 | 1,351 | 1,931 | 131 | 160 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Tatsuma Ito | #1,822 | #60 | 725 | 1,726 | 28 | 56 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yoshihito Nishioka | Tatsuma Ito | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #166 | 1,834 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #75 | 1,852 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #73 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #56 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #155 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #36 | 1,858 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #47 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #119 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #69 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #110 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #186 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |