H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Younes El Aynaoui vs Guillaume Raoux H2H: 1-1
Younes El Aynaoui and Guillaume Raoux are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Guillaume Raoux leads 1–0 on grass, while Younes El Aynaoui leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillaume Raoux won the 1996 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAR
Age 54
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1996* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Guillaume Raoux | 6-3 6-1 6-3 | Younes El Aynaoui | Match data |
| Jan 6, 1996* | Doha | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Younes El Aynaoui | 6-2 6-3 | Guillaume Raoux | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Younes El Aynaoui | #1,592 | #14 | 1,635 | 1,923 | 243 | 219 | 52.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Guillaume Raoux | #1,033 | #35 | 1,041 | 1,806 | 175 | 222 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Younes El Aynaoui | Guillaume Raoux | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #351 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #311 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #51 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #104 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #93 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1995 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #85 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #45 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2000 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #25 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #53 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2001 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #137 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2002 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #22 | 1,773 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #14 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #644 | 1,739 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2005 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #228 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,610 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2008 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #201 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #720 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |