H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Younes El Aynaoui vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 3-1
Younes El Aynaoui holds a 3–1 lead over Hicham Arazi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Younes El Aynaoui leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Hicham Arazi leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 2003 Paris Masters third round 4-6 6-3 1-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAR
Age 54
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2003* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Hicham Arazi | 4-6 6-3 1-2 (ret.) | Younes El Aynaoui | Match data |
| Apr 12, 2003* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Younes El Aynaoui | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
| Jan 3, 2003* | Doha | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Younes El Aynaoui | 6-4 7-6(1) | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
| Aug 30, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Younes El Aynaoui | 6-3 6-4 2-0 (ret.) | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Younes El Aynaoui | #1,592 | #14 | 1,635 | 1,923 | 243 | 219 | 52.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Younes El Aynaoui | Hicham Arazi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #351 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #311 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #51 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #45 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2000 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #25 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2001 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2002 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #22 | 1,773 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #14 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #644 | 1,739 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2005 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #228 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,610 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2008 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #201 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #720 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |