H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Younes El Aynaoui vs Ivo Heuberger H2H: 0-1

Ivo Heuberger holds a 1–0 lead over Younes El Aynaoui in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivo Heuberger leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivo Heuberger won the 2001 Australian Open round of 128 6-2 5-4 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Younes El Aynaoui
MAR Age 55 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Ivo Heuberger
SUI Age 50 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ivo Heuberger #234 6-2 5-4 (ret.) Younes El Aynaoui #31 Match data Jan 17, 2001* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Younes El Aynaoui #1,592 #14 1,635 1,923 244 221 52.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Ivo Heuberger #1,496 #102 398 1,638 33 72 31.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Younes El Aynaoui Ivo Heuberger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1990 0–1 0.0% #351 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1992 3–2 60.0% #311 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1993 16–14 53.3% #51 1,636 0 0 1997 1–3 25.0% #188 1,494 0 0
22 1994 15–27 35.7% #117 1,516 0 0 1998 6–12 33.3% #143 1,516 0 0
23 1995 4–5 44.4% #110 1,562 0 0 1999 1–2 33.3% #221 1,501 0 0
24 1996 15–22 40.5% #70 1,568 0 0 2000 1–4 20.0% #222 1,447 0 0
25 1997 2–2 50.0% #237 1,581 0 0 2001 6–9 40.0% #112 1,597 0 0
26 1998 5–2 71.4% #45 1,663 0 0 2002 6–14 30.0% #127 1,609 0 0
27 1999 27–23 54.0% #33 1,720 0 1 2003 3–10 23.1% #155 1,515 0 0
28 2000 36–26 58.1% #25 1,717 0 1 2004 7–14 33.3% #124 1,588 0 0
29 2001 31–23 57.4% #38 1,823 0 2 2005 2–4 33.3% #214 1,526 0 0
30 2002 42–25 62.7% #22 1,773 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 2003 38–26 59.4% #14 1,835 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 2004 0–5 0.0% #644 1,730 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2005 1–10 9.1% #228 1,592 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 2006 2–2 50.0% #189 1,607 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2007 1–3 25.0% #167 1,615 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2008 5–2 71.4% #201 1,698 0 5 — — — — — — —
38 2010 1–1 50.0% #720 1,689 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Younes El Aynaoui Ivo Heuberger
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 8 17 25 32.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 4 8 12 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1996 9 10 19 47.4% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2001 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1998 — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2002 4 8 12 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1999 4 6 10 40.0% 21 14 35 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2000 15 12 27 55.6% 18 11 29 62.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2004 2 6 8 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2001 5 9 14 35.7% 20 12 32 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 2005 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2002 18 12 30 60.0% 22 7 29 75.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 23 12 35 65.7% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2006 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 90 93 183 49.2% 135 102 237 57.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 9 16 25 36.0% — 21 43 64 32.8% 2 13 15 13.3% 4 8 12 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Younes El Aynaoui Ivo Heuberger
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1990 1492 103.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 1532 116.8 — — — — — +42 — 60.0% +0.47 2–1 (67%) — — +0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1993 1637 136.8 — — — — -93 +76 — 51.4% +0.19 8–6 (57%) 6–8 (43%) 100.3 +0.77 1997 1495 110.8 -0.34 -0.05 0.958 49.0% +40 — — 33.3% -1.11 0–1 1–0 — +0.09
22 1994 1517 125.5 — — — — +44 +45 — 37.8% -0.75 3–9 (25%) 7–9 (44%) 94.7 +1.14 1998 1517 123.2 -2.63 +0.15 0.858 47.3% +24 — +121 42.5% -0.78 0–4 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 95.7 -0.39
23 1995 1562 110.8 — — — — -30 +67 — 48.0% -0.32 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +1.06 1999 1502 100.0 -0.07 -1.10 0.846 47.3% +25 — — 28.6% -0.71 0–1 0–1 — +0.45
24 1996 1569 135.0 — — — — +36 +10 — 46.3% -0.22 6–6 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 103.7 -0.66 2000 1448 106.4 -1.72 -0.96 0.794 46.2% +23 — — 33.3% -0.58 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.39
25 1997 1582 114.0 — — — — — +36 — 50.0% -0.25 — 2–0 — +0.10 2001 1598 116.0 -0.81 -1.31 0.872 47.2% -11 — — 35.3% -0.97 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.07
26 1998 1664 129.0 — — — — — +55 — 69.2% +0.69 0–1 1–0 — -0.43 2002 1609 126.6 -1.20 -2.63 0.799 46.2% +21 -193 -13 36.7% -1.04 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 100.2 -0.83
27 1999 1721 149.4 — — — — -67 +83 — 56.9% +0.53 5–10 (33%) 11–10 (52%) 97.9 -2.15 2003 1515 111.5 -0.36 -1.37 0.927 48.9% +14 — — 30.0% -1.17 1–1 0–5 (0%) — +0.46
28 2000 1717 137.4 — — — — -35 +105 -161 57.7% +0.27 11–11 (50%) 22–12 (65%) 103.5 +1.57 2004 1588 124.4 -1.89 -0.40 0.889 48.4% -18 -149 — 39.6% -0.35 0–3 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 94.8 +0.07
29 2001 1823 138.8 — — — — -113 +14 -234 55.9% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 19–13 (59%) 105.8 -0.38 2005 1526 99.8 -0.58 +0.36 1.031 49.9% +7 — — 36.4% -1.18 1–0 1–1 — +0.74
30 2002 1774 143.3 — — — — -28 +122 — 57.1% +0.34 16–10 (62%) 16–13 (55%) 102.1 -0.43 2006 1504 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 1835 143.2 +4.34 -1.40 1.064 51.1% +15 -32 -219 59.6% +0.49 12–10 (55%) 25–19 (57%) 101.2 +1.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1731 108.3 -5.09 -3.78 0.366 33.4% +8 — — 0.0% -4.17 — — — -0.47 2008 1488 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 1592 108.9 -4.60 -4.26 0.672 42.5% +43 +145 — 16.0% -2.44 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2006 1608 110.3 +0.93 +2.53 1.201 52.2% +26 — — 66.7% +0.50 — 0–1 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 1615 121.2 -0.65 +0.01 0.814 46.6% +66 — — 33.3% -1.22 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 1699 118.9 +2.44 +0.53 1.125 52.9% — +102 — 73.3% +1.20 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2010 1689 101.0 -1.64 -2.05 0.830 46.2% — — — 50.0% -1.50 — 2–0 — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1923 143.4 +2.19 -1.55 0.940 49.1% -17 +62 -210 53.2% +0.12 76–76 (50%) 124–100 (55%) 104.2 +0.59 — 1638 121.5 -1.34 -0.98 0.874 47.7% +9 -164 +64 36.7% -0.84 6–17 (26%) 13–18 (42%) 87.9 +1.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.