H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Younes El Aynaoui vs James Blake H2H: 0-2

James Blake holds a 2–0 lead over Younes El Aynaoui in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, James Blake leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, James Blake won the 2003 Long Island semifinal 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Younes El Aynaoui
MAR Age 54 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
James Blake
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
James Blake #41 6-3 6-1 Younes El Aynaoui #22 Match data Aug 23, 2003* SF Long Island ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
James Blake #40 4-6 6-0 6-3 Younes El Aynaoui #18 Match data May 8, 2002* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Younes El Aynaoui #1,592 #14 1,635 1,923 244 221 52.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
James Blake #1,020 #4 3,550 2,041 349 237 59.6% 0 0 0 1 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Younes El Aynaoui James Blake
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1990 0–1 0.0% #351 1,491 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1999 1–4 20.0% #219 1,479 0 0
20 1992 3–2 60.0% #311 1,532 0 0 2000 0–4 0.0% #212 1,453 0 0
21 1993 16–14 53.3% #51 1,636 0 0 2001 11–9 55.0% #73 1,647 0 0
22 1994 15–27 35.7% #117 1,516 0 0 2002 34–22 60.7% #28 1,815 0 1
23 1995 4–5 44.4% #110 1,562 0 0 2003 30–23 56.6% #37 1,794 0 1
24 1996 15–22 40.5% #70 1,568 0 0 2004 15–13 53.6% #97 1,692 0 1
25 1997 2–2 50.0% #237 1,581 0 0 2005 34–20 63.0% #23 1,924 0 3
26 1998 5–2 71.4% #45 1,663 0 0 2006 57–21 73.1% #4 1,999 0 8
27 1999 27–23 54.0% #33 1,720 0 1 2007 49–21 70.0% #13 1,916 0 10
28 2000 36–26 58.1% #25 1,717 0 1 2008 44–22 66.7% #10 1,883 0 10
29 2001 31–23 57.4% #38 1,823 0 2 2009 23–18 56.1% #44 1,849 0 10
30 2002 42–25 62.7% #22 1,773 0 5 2010 15–17 46.9% #135 1,759 0 10
31 2003 38–26 59.4% #14 1,835 0 5 2011 19–16 54.3% #59 1,824 0 10
32 2004 0–5 0.0% #644 1,730 0 5 2012 8–12 40.0% #127 1,781 0 10
33 2005 1–10 9.1% #228 1,592 0 5 2013 9–14 39.1% #153 1,711 0 10
34 2006 2–2 50.0% #189 1,607 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2007 1–3 25.0% #167 1,615 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2008 5–2 71.4% #201 1,698 0 5 — — — — — — —
38 2010 1–1 50.0% #720 1,689 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Younes El Aynaoui James Blake
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 1992 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2001 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
22 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 8 17 25 32.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2002 21 12 33 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 24 14 38 63.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1996 9 10 19 47.4% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2005 28 13 41 68.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1998 — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2006 46 14 60 76.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1999 4 6 10 40.0% 21 14 35 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2007 40 15 55 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 2000 15 12 27 55.6% 18 11 29 62.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2008 33 15 48 68.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 2001 5 9 14 35.7% 20 12 32 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 2009 13 11 24 54.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 2002 18 12 30 60.0% 22 7 29 75.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2010 15 15 30 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 2003 23 12 35 65.7% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2011 18 14 32 56.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2004 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2005 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 2006 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 90 93 183 49.2% 135 102 237 57.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 9 16 25 36.0% — 273 164 437 62.5% 39 39 78 50.0% 32 27 59 54.2% 5 7 12 41.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 88/97 of Younes El Aynaoui's and 563/586 of James Blake's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Younes El Aynaoui James Blake
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 1/1 8.0 7.0 49.1% 60.4% 47.3% 66.7% 15.4% 53.7% 34.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 5/5 3.6 4.4 54.3% 64.1% 45.3% 41.7% 36.7% 55.8% 31.8%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 4/4 3.3 3.0 48.4% 58.5% 30.3% 35.4% 54.5% 44.2% 38.6%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 17/20 5.7 2.5 59.8% 71.7% 54.9% 64.8% 42.6% 64.8% 37.2%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 50/56 4.5 2.5 58.7% 71.0% 51.7% 62.3% 44.2% 63.1% 39.2%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 52/53 5.2 3.0 60.2% 71.5% 51.7% 56.1% 48.8% 63.6% 40.7%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 28/28 4.8 2.4 60.2% 70.7% 51.0% 51.0% 36.6% 63.0% 39.1%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 54/54 6.6 2.4 58.6% 74.9% 53.7% 62.7% 41.6% 66.2% 39.7%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 77/78 6.1 2.7 57.5% 73.3% 53.3% 61.1% 44.9% 64.8% 41.9%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 67/70 7.4 2.9 57.8% 76.8% 54.8% 62.3% 47.5% 67.4% 39.1%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 59/66 7.0 2.6 55.7% 75.0% 52.5% 54.6% 46.8% 65.0% 39.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 41/41 6.3 3.0 57.3% 74.0% 53.5% 60.6% 41.0% 65.3% 35.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 32/32 5.2 2.8 57.4% 72.1% 52.4% 53.6% 37.7% 63.7% 36.3%
31 2003 58/64 10.7 2.9 65.7% 75.4% 50.8% 67.6% 41.2% 66.9% 35.2% 2011 33/35 5.5 3.8 57.7% 74.1% 47.4% 61.0% 46.0% 62.8% 35.5%
32 2004 4/5 1.0 3.3 64.2% 48.9% 32.0% 46.9% 0.0% 42.4% 21.1% 2012 20/20 5.4 3.1 56.9% 71.3% 49.4% 51.8% 46.5% 62.0% 36.7%
33 2005 11/11 2.4 3.5 61.8% 60.7% 40.1% 48.9% 25.2% 52.9% 31.7% 2013 23/23 6.0 2.7 53.4% 75.6% 48.6% 58.9% 49.1% 62.6% 37.7%
34 2006 3/4 5.7 2.0 56.4% 78.3% 53.6% 57.8% 33.0% 67.0% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 4/4 5.0 1.8 67.9% 69.5% 44.5% 53.4% 35.1% 62.0% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 6/7 9.5 2.7 64.0% 77.9% 48.6% 64.3% 58.3% 67.4% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2010 2/2 8.0 3.0 59.3% 78.4% 40.6% 58.3% 12.5% 62.9% 30.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 88/465 8.6 2.9 64.7% 72.4% 48.0% 62.9% 37.3% 63.8% 34.1% — 563/586 6.0 2.8 57.7% 73.3% 52.1% 58.7% 44.5% 64.3% 38.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Younes El Aynaoui James Blake
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1990 1492 103.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.05 1998 1492 98.2 +0.92 -1.01 0.743 44.6% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.01
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1480 105.6 -2.20 -0.63 0.718 44.0% +30 — — 16.7% -2.42 1–0 0–1 — -0.11
20 1992 1532 116.7 — — — — — +42 — 60.0% +0.47 2–1 (67%) — — +0.45 2000 1453 104.3 -4.21 +0.21 0.692 41.4% +17 — — 0.0% -3.63 — 0–1 — -0.23
21 1993 1637 136.8 — — — — -93 +76 — 51.4% +0.19 8–6 (57%) 6–8 (43%) 100.3 +0.77 2001 1647 135.3 +2.25 +0.39 1.059 51.0% -18 — -87 55.1% +0.55 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 101.7 +0.08
22 1994 1517 125.5 — — — — +44 +45 — 37.8% -0.75 3–9 (25%) 7–9 (44%) 94.7 +1.14 2002 1816 147.9 +1.40 +2.12 1.061 51.1% -26 -178 -199 56.1% +0.32 11–10 (52%) 9–7 (56%) 104.0 -0.19
23 1995 1562 110.8 — — — — -30 +67 — 48.0% -0.32 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +1.06 2003 1794 146.7 +1.54 +3.57 1.120 52.2% +26 -165 -202 58.3% +0.52 6–12 (33%) 15–9 (63%) 98.1 -0.97
24 1996 1569 135.0 — — — — +36 +10 — 46.3% -0.22 6–6 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 103.7 -0.66 2004 1692 126.8 -0.56 +1.37 1.056 50.9% +63 -67 — 55.1% +0.38 3–4 (43%) 7–3 (70%) 101.0 +2.11
25 1997 1582 114.0 — — — — — +36 — 50.0% -0.25 — 2–0 — +0.10 2005 1925 148.8 +3.11 +2.61 1.175 52.6% +27 -259 -338 61.2% +0.81 8–9 (47%) 10–15 (40%) 98.1 -1.49
26 1998 1664 129.0 — — — — — +55 — 69.2% +0.69 0–1 1–0 — -0.43 2006 2000 158.3 +2.59 +5.15 1.189 53.1% +48 -316 -257 64.5% +0.91 17–8 (68%) 18–14 (56%) 104.4 +0.23
27 1999 1721 149.4 — — — — -67 +83 — 56.9% +0.53 5–10 (33%) 11–10 (52%) 97.9 -2.15 2007 1917 151.1 +3.35 +2.66 1.201 53.1% +45 -237 -153 66.3% +1.01 12–9 (57%) 20–16 (56%) 97.1 +3.66
28 2000 1717 137.4 — — — — -35 +105 -161 57.7% +0.27 11–11 (50%) 22–12 (65%) 103.5 +1.57 2008 1883 152.4 +2.01 +2.91 1.131 52.4% +72 -189 -110 61.9% +0.79 13–11 (54%) 12–11 (52%) 97.3 +4.15
29 2001 1823 138.8 — — — — -113 +14 -234 55.9% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 19–13 (59%) 105.8 -0.38 2009 1850 151.0 +2.02 +0.45 1.012 50.5% +25 -106 -16 53.8% +0.24 7–8 (47%) 14–11 (56%) 101.0 -0.82
30 2002 1774 143.3 — — — — -28 +122 — 57.1% +0.34 16–10 (62%) 16–13 (55%) 102.1 -0.43 2010 1760 142.1 -0.13 0.00 1.000 50.0% +24 — — 49.4% -0.01 6–9 (40%) 5–6 (45%) 93.5 -0.97
31 2003 1835 143.2 +4.34 -1.40 1.064 51.1% +15 -32 -219 59.6% +0.49 12–10 (55%) 25–19 (57%) 101.2 +1.73 2011 1825 150.5 -0.14 -0.22 0.954 49.7% +33 — — 50.0% -0.01 6–5 (55%) 7–8 (47%) 99.3 -0.57
32 2004 1731 108.3 -5.09 -3.78 0.366 33.4% +8 — — 0.0% -4.17 — — — -0.47 2012 1781 139.4 -0.94 -0.30 0.965 49.4% +57 — — 45.5% -0.34 2–6 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 94.5 +0.24
33 2005 1592 108.9 -4.60 -4.26 0.672 42.5% +43 +145 — 16.0% -2.44 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.39 2013 1712 137.4 -1.34 +1.25 1.009 50.5% +56 — -13 42.1% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 +0.69
34 2006 1608 110.3 +0.93 +2.53 1.201 52.2% +26 — — 66.7% +0.50 — 0–1 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 1615 121.2 -0.65 +0.01 0.814 46.6% +66 — — 33.3% -1.22 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 1699 118.9 +2.44 +0.53 1.125 52.9% — +102 — 73.3% +1.20 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2010 1689 101.0 -1.64 -2.05 0.830 46.2% — — — 50.0% -1.50 — 2–0 — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1923 143.4 +2.19 -1.55 0.940 49.1% -17 +62 -210 53.2% +0.12 76–76 (50%) 124–100 (55%) 104.2 +0.59 — 2042 153.8 +1.56 +2.23 1.088 51.6% +35 -188 -160 57.2% +0.48 97–99 (49%) 127–119 (52%) 97.2 +1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.