H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Younes El Aynaoui vs Jose Acasuso H2H: 0-1

Jose Acasuso holds a 1–0 lead over Younes El Aynaoui in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jose Acasuso leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jose Acasuso won the 2005 Cincinnati Open round of 64 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Younes El Aynaoui
MAR Age 54 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jose Acasuso
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jose Acasuso #52 6-3 6-2 Younes El Aynaoui #325 Match data Aug 17, 2005* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Younes El Aynaoui #1,592 #14 1,635 1,923 244 221 52.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Jose Acasuso #1,107 #20 1,640 1,830 181 178 50.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Younes El Aynaoui Jose Acasuso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1990 0–1 0.0% #351 1,491 0 0 2001 8–12 40.0% #86 1,536 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2002 21–17 55.3% #41 1,666 0 1
20 1992 3–2 60.0% #311 1,532 0 0 2003 11–19 36.7% #101 1,614 0 1
21 1993 16–14 53.3% #51 1,636 0 0 2004 18–16 52.9% #67 1,685 0 2
22 1994 15–27 35.7% #117 1,516 0 0 2005 27–26 50.9% #40 1,725 0 2
23 1995 4–5 44.4% #110 1,562 0 0 2006 28–20 58.3% #27 1,710 0 3
24 1996 15–22 40.5% #70 1,568 0 0 2007 18–19 48.6% #65 1,686 0 3
25 1997 2–2 50.0% #237 1,581 0 0 2008 26–24 52.0% #48 1,697 0 3
26 1998 5–2 71.4% #45 1,663 0 0 2009 21–21 50.0% #51 1,733 0 3
27 1999 27–23 54.0% #33 1,720 0 1 2010 1–3 25.0% #253 1,667 0 3
28 2000 36–26 58.1% #25 1,717 0 1 2011 2–1 66.7% #255 1,657 0 3
29 2001 31–23 57.4% #38 1,823 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2002 42–25 62.7% #22 1,773 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 2003 38–26 59.4% #14 1,835 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 2004 0–5 0.0% #644 1,730 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2005 1–10 9.1% #228 1,592 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 2006 2–2 50.0% #189 1,607 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2007 1–3 25.0% #167 1,615 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2008 5–2 71.4% #201 1,698 0 5 — — — — — — —
38 2010 1–1 50.0% #720 1,689 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Younes El Aynaoui Jose Acasuso
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 20 10 30 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1992 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 3 8 11 27.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 18 11 29 62.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 8 17 25 32.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2005 9 10 19 47.4% 16 14 30 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 6 10 16 37.5% 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1996 9 10 19 47.4% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 5 7 12 41.7% 13 12 25 52.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2008 10 12 22 45.5% 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — — — — —
26 1998 — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2009 7 8 15 46.7% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1999 4 6 10 40.0% 21 14 35 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2010 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2000 15 12 27 55.6% 18 11 29 62.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
29 2001 5 9 14 35.7% 20 12 32 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 18 12 30 60.0% 22 7 29 75.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 23 12 35 65.7% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2006 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 90 93 183 49.2% 135 102 237 57.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 9 16 25 36.0% — 42 67 109 38.5% 135 98 233 57.9% 0 8 8 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Younes El Aynaoui Jose Acasuso
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1518 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 1492 103.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.05 2001 1537 125.9 -1.22 -2.64 0.825 46.8% -26 +67 — 42.0% -0.64 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.39
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1667 134.9 -0.20 -0.36 0.990 49.8% -189 +134 — 52.8% +0.12 3–4 (43%) 7–3 (70%) — +1.97
20 1992 1532 116.7 — — — — — +42 — 60.0% +0.47 2–1 (67%) — — +0.45 2003 1614 125.8 -0.09 -3.06 0.865 47.6% -127 +114 — 38.0% -0.53 5–5 (50%) 1–7 (13%) — -0.45
21 1993 1637 136.8 — — — — -93 +76 — 51.4% +0.19 8–6 (57%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77 2004 1686 136.4 +0.65 -0.32 1.010 50.2% -228 +141 — 52.6% -0.08 4–4 (50%) 9–3 (75%) — -0.74
22 1994 1517 125.5 — — — — +44 +45 — 37.8% -0.75 3–9 (25%) 7–9 (44%) — +1.14 2005 1725 137.2 +2.49 -0.53 1.034 50.4% -82 +16 — 48.8% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) — +0.52
23 1995 1562 110.8 — — — — -30 +67 — 48.0% -0.32 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +1.06 2006 1711 145.1 +2.75 +0.79 1.124 52.1% -91 +141 — 56.3% +0.60 9–8 (53%) 8–12 (40%) — +2.36
24 1996 1569 135.0 — — — — +36 +10 — 46.3% -0.22 6–6 (50%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.66 2007 1686 138.1 -0.78 +1.04 1.023 50.3% -59 +104 — 52.5% +0.01 1–4 (20%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.97
25 1997 1582 114.0 — — — — — +36 — 50.0% -0.25 — 2–0 — +0.10 2008 1697 140.0 -1.63 +0.93 0.973 49.5% -55 +78 — 50.9% +0.17 8–6 (57%) 5–11 (31%) — +1.79
26 1998 1664 129.0 — — — — — +55 — 69.2% +0.69 0–1 1–0 — -0.43 2009 1733 148.1 0.00 -1.51 0.931 48.9% -59 +71 — 53.8% +0.22 5–3 (63%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.56
27 1999 1721 149.4 — — — — -67 +83 — 56.9% +0.53 5–10 (33%) 11–10 (52%) — -2.15 2010 1668 108.9 -1.74 -1.64 1.122 51.9% — — — 37.5% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.71
28 2000 1717 137.4 — — — — -35 +105 -161 57.7% +0.27 11–11 (50%) 22–12 (65%) — +1.57 2011 1657 116.1 +0.80 +1.94 1.062 50.7% — +93 — 57.1% +1.00 1–0 0–1 — -0.36
29 2001 1823 138.8 — — — — -113 +14 -234 55.9% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 19–13 (59%) — -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1774 143.3 — — — — -28 +122 — 57.1% +0.34 16–10 (62%) 16–13 (55%) — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 1835 143.2 +4.34 -1.40 1.064 51.1% +15 -32 -219 59.6% +0.49 12–10 (55%) 25–19 (57%) — +1.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1731 108.3 -5.09 -3.78 0.366 33.4% +8 — — 0.0% -4.17 — — — -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 1592 109.0 -4.60 -4.26 0.672 42.5% +43 +145 — 16.0% -2.44 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2006 1608 110.3 +0.93 +2.53 1.201 52.2% +26 — — 66.7% +0.50 — 0–1 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 1615 121.2 -0.65 +0.01 0.814 46.6% +66 — — 33.3% -1.22 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 1699 118.9 +2.44 +0.53 1.125 52.9% — +102 — 73.3% +1.20 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2010 1689 101.0 -1.64 -2.05 0.830 46.2% — — — 50.0% -1.50 — 2–0 — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1923 143.4 +2.19 -1.55 0.940 49.1% -17 +62 -210 53.2% +0.12 76–76 (50%) 124–100 (55%) 104.2 +0.59 — 1830 143.9 +0.39 -0.37 0.991 49.8% -86 +97 — 50.5% +0.05 47–45 (51%) 59–66 (47%) 101.2 +1.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.