H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Younes El Aynaoui vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 2-1
Younes El Aynaoui holds a 2–1 lead over Juan Ignacio Chela in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Younes El Aynaoui leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Younes El Aynaoui won the 2001 Amsterdam quarterfinal 7-6(4) 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAR
Age 54
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2001* | Amsterdam | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Younes El Aynaoui | 7-6(4) 4-6 7-5 | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
| Feb 22, 2001* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Juan Ignacio Chela | 6-2 6-4 | Younes El Aynaoui | Match data |
| Jun 2, 2000* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Younes El Aynaoui | 6-3 6-4 6-0 | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Younes El Aynaoui | #1,592 | #14 | 1,635 | 1,923 | 243 | 219 | 52.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Younes El Aynaoui | Juan Ignacio Chela | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #351 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #311 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #51 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1995 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1996 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1998 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #45 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2000 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #25 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2001 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2002 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #22 | 1,773 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #14 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #644 | 1,739 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2005 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #228 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,610 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2008 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #201 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #720 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |