H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Younes El Aynaoui vs Laurence Tieleman H2H: 1-0

Younes El Aynaoui holds a 1–0 lead over Laurence Tieleman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Younes El Aynaoui leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Younes El Aynaoui won the 2000 Casablanca round of 16 7-6(4) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Younes El Aynaoui
MAR Age 55 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Laurence Tieleman
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Younes El Aynaoui #16 7-6(4) 6-4 Laurence Tieleman #110 Match data Apr 14, 2000* R16 Casablanca ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Younes El Aynaoui #1,592 #14 1,635 1,923 244 221 52.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Laurence Tieleman #1,442 #76 625 1,653 41 62 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Younes El Aynaoui Laurence Tieleman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1990 0–1 0.0% #351 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1992 3–2 60.0% #311 1,532 0 0 1993 4–4 50.0% #148 1,539 0 0
21 1993 16–14 53.3% #51 1,636 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #163 1,533 0 0
22 1994 15–27 35.7% #117 1,516 0 0 1995 2–4 33.3% #197 1,525 0 0
23 1995 4–5 44.4% #110 1,562 0 0 1996 1–4 20.0% #240 1,483 0 0
24 1996 15–22 40.5% #70 1,568 0 0 1997 0–2 0.0% #297 1,458 0 0
25 1997 2–2 50.0% #237 1,581 0 0 1998 10–7 58.8% #107 1,594 0 0
26 1998 5–2 71.4% #45 1,663 0 0 1999 14–21 40.0% #87 1,605 0 0
27 1999 27–23 54.0% #33 1,720 0 1 2000 10–19 34.5% #136 1,547 0 0
28 2000 36–26 58.1% #25 1,717 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2001 31–23 57.4% #38 1,823 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2002 42–25 62.7% #22 1,773 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 2003 38–26 59.4% #14 1,835 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 2004 0–5 0.0% #644 1,730 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2005 1–10 9.1% #228 1,592 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 2006 2–2 50.0% #189 1,607 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2007 1–3 25.0% #167 1,615 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2008 5–2 71.4% #201 1,698 0 5 — — — — — — —
38 2010 1–1 50.0% #720 1,689 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Younes El Aynaoui Laurence Tieleman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
21 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 8 17 25 32.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 1996 9 10 19 47.4% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1998 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1998 — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 1999 10 13 23 43.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1999 4 6 10 40.0% 21 14 35 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 8 10 18 44.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
28 2000 15 12 27 55.6% 18 11 29 62.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 5 9 14 35.7% 20 12 32 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 18 12 30 60.0% 22 7 29 75.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 23 12 35 65.7% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2006 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 90 93 183 49.2% 135 102 237 57.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 9 16 25 36.0% — 19 31 50 38.0% 1 10 11 9.1% 20 18 38 52.6% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Younes El Aynaoui Laurence Tieleman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1990 1492 103.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 1532 116.8 — — — — — +42 — 60.0% +0.47 2–1 (67%) — — +0.45 1993 1539 101.3 +0.30 -0.77 1.004 48.9% — — +98 47.6% -0.52 1–1 1–1 — +0.78
21 1993 1637 136.8 — — — — -93 +76 — 51.4% +0.19 8–6 (57%) 6–8 (43%) 100.3 +0.77 1994 1533 100.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 2–0 — -0.18
22 1994 1517 125.5 — — — — +44 +45 — 37.8% -0.75 3–9 (25%) 7–9 (44%) 94.7 +1.14 1995 1526 97.9 -1.88 -3.07 0.656 44.0% — — +108 30.8% -1.69 1–0 1–0 — +0.41
23 1995 1562 110.8 — — — — -30 +67 — 48.0% -0.32 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +1.06 1996 1484 97.3 -0.40 +0.45 0.896 48.4% — — +155 27.3% -0.91 0–1 0–2 — +0.53
24 1996 1569 135.0 — — — — +36 +10 — 46.3% -0.22 6–6 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 103.7 -0.66 1997 1459 103.0 -1.61 -3.02 0.744 44.8% — — — 28.6% -1.43 0–1 — — +0.07
25 1997 1582 114.0 — — — — — +36 — 50.0% -0.25 — 2–0 — +0.10 1998 1594 123.4 +1.29 -2.10 0.947 50.0% -107 — +163 53.7% +0.07 5–4 (56%) 5–2 (71%) 107.0 +0.20
26 1998 1664 129.0 — — — — — +55 — 69.2% +0.69 0–1 1–0 — -0.43 1999 1605 122.2 +1.18 -3.84 0.930 48.7% -38 — +94 45.3% -0.59 3–7 (30%) 7–8 (47%) 99.6 +1.02
27 1999 1721 149.4 — — — — -67 +83 — 56.9% +0.53 5–10 (33%) 11–10 (52%) 97.9 -2.15 2000 1548 109.7 -1.89 -4.30 0.796 46.5% +22 -109 +70 37.9% -0.71 2–2 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 98.2 +1.41
28 2000 1717 137.4 — — — — -35 +105 -161 57.7% +0.27 11–11 (50%) 22–12 (65%) 103.5 +1.57 2001 1533 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 1823 138.8 — — — — -113 +14 -234 55.9% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 19–13 (59%) 105.8 -0.38 2002 1503 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1774 143.3 — — — — -28 +122 — 57.1% +0.34 16–10 (62%) 16–13 (55%) 102.1 -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 1835 143.2 +4.34 -1.40 1.064 51.1% +15 -32 -219 59.6% +0.49 12–10 (55%) 25–19 (57%) 101.2 +1.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2004 1731 108.3 -5.09 -3.78 0.366 33.4% +8 — — 0.0% -4.17 — — — -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2005 1592 108.9 -4.60 -4.26 0.672 42.5% +43 +145 — 16.0% -2.44 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2006 1608 110.3 +0.93 +2.53 1.201 52.2% +26 — — 66.7% +0.50 — 0–1 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2007 1615 121.2 -0.65 +0.01 0.814 46.6% +66 — — 33.3% -1.22 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2008 1699 118.9 +2.44 +0.53 1.125 52.9% — +102 — 73.3% +1.20 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2010 1689 101.0 -1.64 -2.05 0.830 46.2% — — — 50.0% -1.50 — 2–0 — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1923 143.4 +2.19 -1.55 0.940 49.1% -17 +62 -210 53.2% +0.12 76–76 (50%) 124–100 (55%) 104.2 +0.59 — 1653 115.4 +0.12 -3.11 0.882 48.1% -24 -109 +118 42.8% -0.61 12–17 (41%) 21–21 (50%) 102.1 +4.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.